Try 2-2 | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Astrophotography

Resize to fit window

Prova Stelle View gallery (8 photos)

Try 2-2 sent on November 03, 2012 (11:00) by Bob. 11 comments, 940 views.

at 18mm, 20 sec f/5.0, ISO 1600, tripod.

Grazie all'utente Astrotrezzi, le prove sull'astrografia sono migliorate rispetto alle prime prove. Purtroppo ieri sera avevo la luna davanti (MAI SUCCESSO) e mi ha dato molto fastidio, ho fotografato dal balcone ma non è una zona MOLTO abitata... C&C Sempre graditi!! Si vede l'angoletto del balcone, ma sono molto curioso di cosa sia quella luce spettacolare in alto a SX

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Fabercom

sent on November 03, 2012 (13:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the light that define spectacular is a flare (a reflection of the lens due to the moon), which alas has ruined the whole picture. In addition, the stars are blurred and light pollution is excessive.
I do not know what you wanted to achieve but as astronomical photos is a lot of work.
If you want to shoot without tripod mount but you have to choose a night without moon and a place with little light pollution, set a pose of up to 25/30 seconds and hope that there is little moisture in the air.

Bob

sent on November 03, 2012 (14:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ you call that light is a spectacular flare „

:-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( :-(

Are blurred because there was too much noise and I tried to reduce a little ... and also do not know if I was able to focus, I shot with the 18-55 kit :/

“ If you want to shoot without tripod mount but you have to choose a night without moon and a place with little light pollution, set a pose of up to 25/30 seconds and hope that there is little moisture in the air. „

I know, but unfortunately I can not afford what is this ... and the moon for the first time I had it before! What ever happened to ...

Astro_kiara

sent on November 03, 2012 (15:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yeah, Bob, for astrophotography * must * choose moonless nights. Something you can do with the moon being not too big (no more than four), but only if you work with focal lengths and resume objects with nebulosity which can suffer from scattered light in the sky. But the general rule is: the more dark, the better!
You can make great pictures without frames, there are many examples in this forum in which the authors use only the stand.
To focus, I know that is critical, especially if you have a lens with the mark you mark where the infinity. I do not know the equipment you use, but if you have the notch is easy: you focus manually to infinity and you should be fine. If you do not have the notch must focus when focus by eye, always manually because the autofocusthe stars can not make it, and then test shots by changing the fire until they see the best condition. The test shots are also recommended if you have the mark of infinity, it is always best to check. There is a lot of patience, but it is the key ingredient of astronomical photos. In Focus can help you a lot if your camera has live view, otherwise you have to look through the viewfinder and exercise all the patience you have.

So, to summarize: no moon and patience in large doses! Do not give up! :-)

hello

Clear

Bob

sent on November 03, 2012 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

27autofocus the stars can not make it, and then test shots by changing the fire until you see the best condition. The test shots are also recommended if you have the mark of infinity, it is always best to check. There is a lot of patience, but it is the key ingredient of astronomical photos. In Focus can help you a lot if your camera has live view, otherwise you have to look through the viewfinder and exercise all the patience you have.

So, to summarize: no moon and patience in large doses! Do not give up!

hello

Clare „
Hello Clare, I have the D3100 and the kit 18-55, but I also have a remote for the astrografia not need much ...
The live view I have it but I do not have racca ... I tried to follow theBoard of Astrotrezzi, trying to focus on the lamppost further but I do not think I succeeded. : (
The rule I know too well, the fact is that we do not stop raining and yesterday returned from the "job" at 10 pm, I did not want to go into the forest ... and I tried to get her from the balcony as the first tests. Unfortunately, the moon was in front of the balcony .. and ... here's the result, I also have more pictures but they are not riuscitoo to publish and soon I have to go ... in the other picture I cercatoo not catch the moon ... even in the trials that I posted today I did not take the moon but here there was that strange light and thought it was something more exciting than a simple FLARE: (( " Eh si, Bob, per la fotografia astronomica *devi* scegliere notti senza luna. Qualcosa si può fare anche con la luna in fase non troppo grande (non oltre il quarto), ma solo se lavori con focali lunghe e non riprendi oggetti con nebulosità che possono soffrire della luce diffusa in cielo. Ma la regola generale è : più è buio, meglio è!
Puoi fare splendide foto anche senza montatura, ci sono vari esempi in questo forum in cui gli autori usano solo il cavalletto.
Per la messa a fuoco, so che è critica, specialmente se non hai un obiettivo con la tacca che ti segna dove si trova il fuoco all'infinito. Non conosco l'attrezzatura che usi, ma se hai la tacca è facile: metti a fuoco manualmente a infinito e dovresti essere a posto. Se non hai la tacca devi focheggiare ad occhio, sempre manualmente perchè l'autofocus sulle stelle non ce la fa, e poi fare degli scatti di prova modificando il fuoco fino a quando non trovi la condizione migliore. Gli scatti di prova sono consigliati anche se hai la tacca dell'infinito, è sempre meglio verificare. Ci va molta pazienza, ma è l'ingrediente fondamentale delle foto astronomiche. Nella messa a fuoco può aiutare molto se la tua fotocamera ha il live view, altrimenti devi guardare nel mirino e esercitare tutta la pazienza di cui disponi.

Quindi, per riassumere : niente luna e pazienza in dosi massicce! Non ti arrendere!

ciao

Chiara"
Ciao Chiara, ho la D3100 e il kit 18-55, ho anche un tele ma per l'astrografia non serve molto...
Il live view ce l'ho ma la racca non ce l'ho... ho provato a seguire il consiglio di Astrotrezzi, cercando di mettere a fuoco il lampione più lontano ma credo di non esserci riuscito. :(
La regola la conosco troppo bene, il fatto è che qui non smette di piove e ieri,tornato dal "lavoretto" alle 10 di sera, non me la sentivo di andare dentro al bosco... e ho cercato di farle dal balcone come le prime prove. purtroppo c'era la luna di fronte al balcone.. e...ecco il risultato, ho anche altre foto che però non sono riuscitoo a pubblicare e tra poco devo andare via... nelle altre foto ho cercatoo di non prendere la luna... anche nella prova che ho pubblicato oggi non ho preso la luna solo che qui c'era quella luce strana e pensavo fosse qualcosa più emozionante che un semplice FLARE :((

Bob	sent on November 03, 2012 (16:21) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) the original picture is this: imageshack.us/photo/my-images/221/13948658.jpg/

user14758

sent on November 04, 2012 (17:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

unfortunately is a Flare .. fault optics and its inclination towards the light rays .. The astrophotography is difficult but doable .. I do not recommend automatic fire .. use the manual ... a tip: do not always "turn the whole iris ring" provides the perfect focus .. for some nikon lenses you have to play a little close to great infinite .. also to make a photo beautiful and pleasant try to put something contrastro .. a plant .. a tree ... But here you have to consider very well the light around you .. ;-)

Bob

sent on November 04, 2012 (22:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ not always "turn the whole iris ring" provides the perfect focus .. „

In fact, I have not turned completely but looking at the light pole away I tried to minimize the size of the " dot "of light ...

For the tree ... how did you already the case ... in the other picture was the tree ... but if I wanted to take this photo in the tree ... I was at the center of the moon pictures super bright ... : (

user15434

sent on November 04, 2012 (23:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

3EBuon work and clear skies,
David

user14758

sent on November 05, 2012 (9:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The road is good .. continues ;-)

Bob

sent on November 05, 2012 (15:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I used the LiveView and I zoomed in to the picture 3 times ... and then I played with the focus ...
The formulaic I run out pretty well! if you magnify the picture of a star you see the blur but no so ... so there are almost!

“ I can not wait to see you at work in New Moon from a dark place! „

I look forward to it myself :-|

user15434

sent on November 05, 2012 (15:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

With time I think we're ... and also the focus does not seem so bad (if you want, send me the shot via e-mail so I can better control).
At proxima,
David

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.