JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user177187
sent on March 02, 2019 (13:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shot, I'd like to know how the autofocus behaves at low lights photographing with the Bighiera 80-200 2.8 Bello scatto, mi piacerebbe sapere come si comporta l'autofocus a basse luci fotografando con il bighiera 80-200 2.8
sent on March 03, 2019 (15:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Meanwhile thanks, then mine is not the Bighiera but the pump, spectacular lenses but slow autofocus, since it uses the engine of the machine and has a nice weight to move as groups. Frankly as optical rendering are satisfied but as autofocus flaw a little, in fact I am intent on replacing it with the Tamron 70-200 F2,8 The version depends on the money that I have available.... Unfortunately the Nikon version is not within my reach! for low light yield is not bad but also depends very much on the machine! Intanto grazie, poi il mio non é il bighiera ma il pompa, lenti spettacolari ma autofocus lento, visto che usa il motore della macchina ed ha un bel peso da spostare come gruppolenti. Francamente come resa ottica sono soddisfatto ma come autofocus pecca un po', di fatti sono intenzionato a sostituirlo con il 70-200 f2,8 tamron la versione dipende dai soldi che avrò a disposizione.... purtroppo la versione Nikon non è alla mia portata! Per la resa a bassa luce non è male ma dipende anche molto dallla macchina!
user177187
sent on March 03, 2019 (21:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ha ha tonight I did 2 hours of volley with this model I use it with D3 and D810 as sharpness to 2.8 I do not find the maximum, slowness is a problem but also with the 300 Af 4 with Silet motor is not that it is a missile if you then do outdoor photos f 5.6-F 8 Go splendidly even with the engine of the machine. Hello Ah ah stasera mi sono fatto 2 ore di volley con questo modello lo uso con D3 e D810 come nitidezza a 2.8 non lo trovo il massimo, la lentezza è un problema ma anche con il 300 Af 4 con silet motor non è che è un missile se poi fai foto all'aperto f 5.6 -f 8 vai splendidamente anche con il motore della macchina. Ciao
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
19.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
