What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 10, 2018 (14:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice! NL spectacular and very apt. Congratulations! :-)
Greetings Michele Molto bella! Bn spettacolare e molto azzeccato. Complimenti! 
Saluti Michele |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (7:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice for atmosphere and location! Molto bella per atmosfera e location! |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (7:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderful scenography, fantastic composition in B/W,
Excellent backlight, wonderful realization,
Many compliments also for the well-deserved EP!
Hello Claudio Meravigliosa scenografia, fantastica composizione in B/N,
ottimo controluce, stupenda realizzazione,
tanti complimenti anche per il meritato EP!
ciao Claudio |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (7:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderfully beautiful ;-) Meravigliosamente bella |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (9:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the idea!
But the result in particular the PP with a slightly coarse rendering does not seem successful! L'idea mi piace !
Però il risultato in particolare la PP con una resa un po' grossolana non mi sembra riuscita ! |
user55404 | sent on May 28, 2018 (12:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quotas I like the idea!
But the result in particular the PP with a slightly coarse rendering does not seem successful! /QUOTE
I agree " L'idea mi piace !
Però il risultato in particolare la PP con una resa un po' grossolana non mi sembra riuscita !"
Concordo |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Easy to comment on ex post without having been on site.
I said this, I would have liked to tighten more on the newlyweds (getting and perhaps exploiting the wider focal length, rather than a 17) and allowing a greater reading of the panorama out of the window.
Then, given the shutter time, I would have diaphragmed to make the highest quality (IMHO) 8-) facile commentare ex post senza esser stati in loco.
Premesso questo, mi sarebbe piaciuto stringere di più sugli sposi (avvicinandomi e sfruttando magari la focale più grandangolare, piuttosto che un 17) e consentendo una lettura maggiore del panorama fuori finestra.
Poi, visto il tempo di scatto, avrei diaframmato per rendere la qualità più alta (IMHO)  |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (12:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wonderfully beautiful, congratulations for the EP. Meravigliosamente bella, complimenti per l'EP. |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (13:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marmor is right but I think that you do not always have time to check all the parameters of shooting, it can happen...
The photo is very beautiful and particular Complimeti!
A salute
Alfonso
Marmor ha ragione ma credo che non sempre si ha tempo di controllare tutti i parametri di scatto, può capitare...
La foto è molto bella e particolare complimeti!
Un saluto
Alfonso
|
| sent on May 28, 2018 (13:36) | This comment has been translated
Magnificent |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (14:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The image is very beautiful.. But it seems taken at 12800 ISO.. Enlarge with the cellphone you see in the areas in the shade a horrible shelling..
But how is it possible that ISO 100 happen this? L'immagine e' molto bella..ma sembra scattata a 12800 iso..ingrandendo con il cellulare si vede nelle zone in ombra uno sgranamento orribile..
Ma com' è possibile che 100 iso succeda questo? |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (14:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Saw the shutter speeds I guess everything that was in front of the window was almost all black... Opening shadows and blacks in PP can happen even if you work at ISO 100... Visto i tempi di scatto credo che tutto ciò che era davanti alla finestra era quasi tutto nero... Aprendo ombre e neri in pp può capitare anche se lavori a 100 ISO... |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (15:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So this image is practically inprintable (if you enlarge it with the cell Spappola let alone with at least a print 30x40.. Or 30x30.. Digital photo album type)..
If this is the dynamic range of the Sony sensor.. That would be quite a disaster. Maybe it centers the flare of optics....
will be editor pick.. But as Qi is unwatchable.... I bought a Sony a7r.. In 2014.. with Zeiss optics and had a completely different yield..
Alive the beauty.. Così quest'immagine é praticamente instampabile( se ingrandirla con il cell si spappola figuriamoci con almeno una stampa 30x40..o 30x30..tipo fotoalbum digitale)..
Se questa é la gamma dinamica del sensore sony..rappresenterebbe un bel disastro..forse centra il flare dell'ottica....
Sarà editor pick..ma come qi é inguardabile....ho acquistato una sony a7r..nel 2014..con ottiche zeiss e aveva tutt'altra resa..
Viva la bellezza.. |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (15:45)
Hello my friend Alessandro..
First: congratulations Editor Choice ''Juza''...wow..
Fantastic picture, contrast ''B.W.'', composition and very beautiful shooting...great job and superb place....congratulations..at you...Jean, |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (19:44) | This comment has been translated
Really nice shot! |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (21:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What a mess.... :-( che pasticcio.... |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (21:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Now I understand that technically is not perfect but from here to say that second mess is exaggerated!
flying over the technical side this photo is a great photo, conveys emotion that is what the photo, the real one, should give first of all!
Renew my compliments for EP Alessandro...
A salute
Alfonso Ora capisco che tecnicamente non è perfetta ma da qui a dire che pasticcio secondo è esagerato!
Sorvolando il lato tecnico questa foto è una gran bella foto, trasmette emozione che è quello che la foto, quella vera, dovrebbe dare prima di tutto!
Rinnovo i miei complimenti per EP Alessandro...
Un saluto
Alfonso |
| sent on May 28, 2018 (22:32) | This comment has been translated
Really really nice, congratulations! |
| sent on May 29, 2018 (8:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What emotion? Of course, the newlyweds were put on the pose...... so this thing stays off? The technical aspect that would appreciate the legibility of both the architectural aspect/people and the sky with the glimpse of landscape... what failed without going into the merit of noise, artifacts etc...
The photograph, even the real one, which then what is not true if the retouching are excluded, I think must fulfil all the principles as a technical emotion and whatnot... The problem is that maybe too many people think just one of these elements to do A good photo... obviously personal opinion...
Mario Quale emozione? ovviamente gli sposi sono stati messi lì in posa......quindi tolto questo cosa rimane? l'aspetto tecnico che avrebbe fatto apprezzare la leggibilità sia dell'aspetto architettonico/persone sia il cielo con lo scorcio di paesaggio...cosa non riuscita senza entrare nel merito del rumore, artefatti etc...
La fotografia, anche quella vera, che poi qual'è quella non vera se si escludono i fotoritocchi, ritengo debba assolvere a tutti i principi come emozione tecnica e quant'altro...il problema è che forse troppe persone pensano basti solo uno di questi elementi per fare una buona fotografia...ovviamente parere personale...
Mario |
| sent on May 29, 2018 (9:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good morning Mario happy of your counter reply!
You're right and I'm like you, the photo has to be done well technically to enhance even more its content, but sometimes there are exceptions such as this (subjective opinion but it seems to many though) that the photos like beyond every aspect purely technical Co or structural,
the author will have been aware of the "limitations" of his photo but despite all the he has been... you know why? He likes it and that's what's important! ;-)
A salute Mario and thank you for your exchange of ideas
Alfonso
Buongiorno Mario felice della tua contro risposta!
Hai ragione e io sono come te, la foto deve essere fatta bene anche tecnicamente per valorizzare ancora più il suo contenuto, ma a volte ci sono delle eccezioni tipo questa (parere soggettivo ma non solo mio) che le foto piace al di là di ogni aspetto puramente tecnico o strutturale,
L'autore sarà stato consapevole dei "limiti" della sua foto ma nonostante tutto l'ha postata...sai perché? Gli piace ed è quello che conta!
Un saluto Mario e grazie per il tuo scambio di idee
Alfonso
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
