RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Untitled Photo...

Galleria 01

View gallery (21 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on June 15, 2011 (11:00) by Emilia. 1 comments, 519 views.

1/500 f/5.3, ISO 400,




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarmoderator
sent on August 13, 2011 (20:56)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


scusami ma non mi convince per questi motivi:
-composizione confusa
-m.d.c. troppo sforzata a tal punto che sono evidenti gli aloni sui contorni dei soggetti e anche sulla firma.
Usa un raggio/radius di 0,5 max 06 e la firma applicala dopo la mdc.
- poca profondità di campo
- maf incerta
- volatile troppo perso .. dovevi avvicinarti di più
- troppi fiori tagliati
Puoi in futuro di fornirci sempre i dati tecnici di scatto come reflex,obiettivo, tempo esp.,n°F., programma di scatto, iso, focale, val.di deviazione diaframma, flash e se hai dovuto ricorrere a complesse modifiche in post-produzione?... fornire questi elementi utili agli altri utenti permette loro di entrare meglio nello spirito della fotografia postata e comprendere le tue scelte nella fase del pre-scatto oltre a permetterci di fare un commento più ragionato e oggettivo.
ciao e buona luce, lauro

I'm sorry but I am not convinced by these reasons:
Composition-confused
Mdc-too strained to the point that the halos are visible on the edges of subjects as well as the signature.
Use a radius / radius of 0.5 max 06 and apply it after the signing of the contrast medium.
- Shallow depth of field
- Maf uncertain
- Volatile too lost .. you had to come closer
- Too many cut flowers
You can in the future to provide more technical data such as shutter SLR, lens, time esp., NF., Program, shutter, ISO, focal length, aperture val.di deviation, flash, and if you had to resort to complex changes in post -production? ... these provide useful information to other users allows them to enter into the spirit of better picture posted and understand your options in the stage of pre-release as well as allow us to make a more reasoned and objective comment.
hello and good light, laurel


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me