What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 26, 2018 (11:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Shot very very successful. However, if you have three metres focally the barlow is a 3 x ... .. .but maybe I 2 m. .. Scatto molto molto ben riuscito. Però se hai tre metri di focale la barlow è una 3x......... ma forse sono 2 metri...... |
| sent on April 26, 2018 (12:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you! I meant 2x1000mm on aps-c, which are 2000 mm x crop full frame than the equivalent 1.5; actually I forgot that this was a 1000 mm to 1500 mm without Barlow. Grazie! Intendevo 2x1000mm su aps-c, che sono 2000mm x 1,5 di crop rispetto all'equivalente full frame;in realtà mi sono dimenticato che questa era a 1000mm dunque a 1500mm, senza Barlow. |
| sent on April 26, 2018 (13:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Understood. ;-) Given the potential, please try to acquire a short movie and play with some stacking SW. .. For the best are Autostakker or Avistack ... ... I saw that for the deepsky there you've already tried ... Capito. Viste le potenzialità, puoi provare ad acquisire un breve filmato e divertirti con qualche SW di stacking..... Per la Luna i migliori sono Autostakker o Avistack......Ho visto che per il deepsky ci hai già provato... |
| sent on April 26, 2018 (13:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
OK, I'll try then. In any case, I opted for the raw to the greater solution and made in pp. Anyway I also various shots to 2000 mm with Barlow and would like to join them (don't stack them) to make a unique panorama of the Lunar disc with more detail and resolution. Photomerge in photoshop right? Why do we need a program that can handle 30 mb to raw files Ok, proverò allora. In ogni caso ho optato per il raw per la maggior risoluzione e resa in pp. Comunque ho anche vari scatti a 2000mm con la Barlow e vorrei unirli (non sovrapporli) per fare un unico "panorama" del disco lunare con maggiori dettagli e risoluzione. Photomerge di photoshop va bene? Perché serve un programma che sappia gestire i 30 mb a file raw |
| sent on April 26, 2018 (14:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You know I've never done mosaics? It would be interesting to an intervention by those who know more .... Sai che non ho mai fatto mosaici ? Sarebbe interessante un intervento di chi ne sa di più.... |
| sent on April 26, 2018 (15:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ For the best are Autostakker or Avistack „
Beautiful shot .... question 22 shots no movie to full moon and I stack them can I try one of these software? " Per la Luna i migliori sono Autostakker o Avistack"
Bello scatto....domanda, ho 22 scatti no filmato a luna piena e vorrei sovrapporli posso provare uno di questi software? |
| sent on April 26, 2018 (16:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had tried a few years ago with those programs I like, but it crashed because they were too many heavy files Io avevo provato qualche anno fa con quei programmi mi pare, ma crashava perché erano troppi pesanti i file |
| sent on April 26, 2018 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many also recommend Registax 6 Molti consigliano anche Registax 6 |
| sent on April 27, 2018 (8:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gold, to add and align the shots there is a procedure in Photoshop but I have never used.
It should be "auto-blend layers" on the net should be explained. Gold, per sommare ed allineare gli scatti c'è una procedura di Photoshop che però non ho mai utilizzato.
Dovrebbe essere "fusione automatica livelli", in rete dovrebbe essere spiegato.... |
| sent on April 27, 2018 (10:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You load files into stack I use when I have to mediate the noise on most shots, but I wanted to try a software that did the alignment and the Union type deep sky stacker but on the moon to increase the detail and definition, but I believe registax goes well Si è carica file in serie la utilizzo quando devo mediare il rumore su più scatti, ma volevo provare un software che facesse l'allineamento e l'unione tipo deep sky stacker ma sulla luna per aumentare il dettaglio e la definizione, ma credo che registax vada bene |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
