What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 23, 2018 (17:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very delicate picture. Okay focus beautiful etc But the real strength is i have inserted this subject with this focus the light. The effect is gorgeous and the picture gets very very interesting and "enjoyable". Foto molto delicata. Ok sfuocato bellissimo ecc. Ma il vero punto di forza è i aver inserito questo soggetto con questo sfuocato in controluce. L'effetto è bellissimo e la foto diventa molto molto interessante e "godibile". |
user33434 | sent on April 23, 2018 (18:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice focus with bubbles, but I'd like some extra depth. Backlight hard enough it seems. The colour rendition is very pleasant as well as the composition. Bello lo sfocato con le bollicine, ma mi sarebbe piaciuta un po' di profondità in più. Controluce abbastanza difficile mi sembra.La resa dei colori è molto gradevole così come la composizione. |
| sent on April 23, 2018 (19:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The composition I like, especially the light coming from the left. I would have liked, the right focus on the petal flower "closer", I don't know if it was your choice given that the same plane of focus petal there is also green leaf at the bottom. As a whole I like but I eye on petal out of focus, maybe my fixation La composizione mi piace, soprattutto la luce che filtra da sinistra. Mi sarebbe piaciuto avere, sul fiore di destra la messa a fuoco sul petalo più "vicino", non so se è stata una tua scelta visto che sullo stesso piano del petalo a fuoco vi è anche la foglia verde in basso. Nel suo insieme mi piace ma l'occhio mi va sul petalo fuori fuoco, forse una mia fissazione |
| sent on April 23, 2018 (19:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The composition I like, especially the light coming from the left. I would have liked, the right focus on the petal flower "closer", I don't know if it was your choice given that the same plane of focus petal there is also green leaf at the bottom. As a whole I like but I eye on petal out of focus, maybe my fixation La composizione mi piace, soprattutto la luce che filtra da sinistra. Mi sarebbe piaciuto avere, sul fiore di destra la messa a fuoco sul petalo più "vicino", non so se è stata una tua scelta visto che sullo stesso piano del petalo a fuoco vi è anche la foglia verde in basso. Nel suo insieme mi piace ma l'occhio mi va sul petalo fuori fuoco, forse una mia fissazione |
| sent on April 23, 2018 (21:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Color composition and blurred I like quite a lot, in my opinion, however, the pdc is too small, especially the part closest fuzzy flower becomes the protagonist more stem than the flower. Then if you drop a little exposure and increases a little contrast boost bubble effect by improving the blurred imho 8-) Composizione colori e sfocato mi piacciono parecchio, secondo me però la pdc è troppo ridotta, in particolare la parte più vicina del fiore sfocato rende protagonista più il gambo che non il fiore. Poi se abbassi di poco l'esposizione e aumenti un po il contrasto amplifichi l'effetto bolle migliorando lo sfocato imho |
| sent on April 24, 2018 (11:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks ragassuoli.
Pippo leaned much to my interpretation of this lens. Probably far from common use.
Namely saturated colors, full of bubbles and so on. Here I have tried a different way, by putting the Sun in the shot.
Result an image less technicolor, but more ethereal and atmospheric.
Adriano, the 1/1600 perhaps gives a different idea, but everything was shaken by the wind, and try a Carthusian at focus point 1.8 is at least optimistic. As a general rule, I try to always focus on the stamens, the yellow part at the center of the flower.
A bit like the eye of the subject.
ALE, I answered you above.
Thank you all. grazie ragassuoli.
Pippo si è avvicinato molto alla mia interpretazione di questa lente. Probabilmente distante dall'uso comune.
Ovvero colori saturi, tripudio di bolle e così via. Qui ho cercato una via diversa, inserendo il sole nello scatto.
Risultato una immagine meno technicolor, ma più eterea e d'atmosfera.
Adriano, i 1/1600 forse dà un'idea diversa, ma tutto era scosso dal vento, e cercare un punto di fuoco certosino a 1,8 è quantomeno ottimistico. Come regola generale, cerco il fuoco sempre sugli stami, la parte gialla al centro del fiore.
Un po' come fosse l'occhio del soggetto da riprendere.
Ale, ti ho risposto sopra.
Grazie a tutti. |
| sent on April 24, 2018 (20:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice Up!
very delicate. ;-)
I was going to hypothesize a Trioplan ... but did you write f 1.8:-/ Bella Massimo!
molto delicata. 
stavo per ipotizzare un Trioplan... ma hai scritto f1.8  |
| sent on April 24, 2018 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oreston ...;-) Oreston... |
| sent on April 24, 2018 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
well, am I close?! ;-) beh, ci sono andato vicino no?! |
| sent on April 24, 2018 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If I'm not cosinon bubbles (not necessarily ...) I think I take too se il cosinon non mi fa bolle (non è detto...) mi sa che me lo prendo pure io |
| sent on April 24, 2018 (23:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would say yes always Meyer is ...;-) Direi di sì, sempre Meyer è... |
| sent on May 07, 2018 (15:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
What mounts adaptor? Che adattatore monti? |
| sent on May 07, 2018 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
M42-NEX M42-NEX |
| sent on October 03, 2018 (19:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful picture and surrender. I never would have said it was an Oreston Bellissima foto e resa. Non avrei mai detto che era un oreston |
| sent on October 03, 2018 (19:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Fabio... Grazie Fabio... |
| sent on February 05, 2019 (15:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Reading the comments I have clarified the ideas, I was already on the biased thinking of a "nice fake" in PP.
Instead, the result of special optics and choices of the photographer.
In short, very beautiful in its disarming simplicity. I envy "the glance".
I would take it as PC screen Saver 8-) leggendo i commenti mi son chiarito le idee, ero già sul prevenuto pensando ad un "bel fake" in PP.
invece, frutto di ottiche particolari e scelte del fotografo.
insomma...molto bella nella sua disarmante semplicità. Invidio "il colpo d'occhio".
la prenderei come screen saver del pc |
| sent on February 05, 2019 (17:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Carlo... Grazie Carlo... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
