What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 23, 2012 (9:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Light a little "duretta" but very nice shot ... Luce un pò "duretta" ma scatto molto bello... |
| sent on October 23, 2012 (10:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oh yes, light duretta in fact, I was in the car and I could not resist it clicks. Is lacking in sharpness and light, it was 11 in the morning so obviously is very dry. Thanks for the criticism, here on this site is always nice to talk about photos, unlike those social where the only comment received was "VOTED, GREAT, fanstastic" even when there are obvious basic errors! :) Eh si, luce duretta in effetti, ero in auto e non ho resistito allo scatto. Pecca in nitidezza e luce, erano le 11 di mattina quindi ovviamente è molto secca. Grazie della critica, qui su questo sito è sempre bello parlare di foto, a differenza di quei social dove l'unico commento ricevuto è "VOTED, GREAT, FANSTASTIC" anche quando ci sono palesi errori di base! :) |
| sent on October 23, 2012 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The scenery is stunning to say the least and definitely worth the shot. More than sharpening the photo shows a mega cloned in the foreground made a little 'too hastily, the end result is graphically very nice but the eye falls there. hello Il paesaggio è a dire poco stupendo e vale sicuramente lo scatto. Più che di nitidezza la foto mostra una mega clonata in primo piano fatta un po' troppo frettolosamente, il risultato finale è graficamente molto piacevole ma l'occhio cade lì. ciao |
| sent on October 23, 2012 (19:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I know, you have to consider that the grass front suffered the classic blur due to the speed of the car, it was necessary for two poles blurred that were part of a fence that was inevitable to avoid the car. It is not that the first effect was sharper. He was completely out of focus style "blur", so I'll just avoid visible parts cloned, but I can not avoid most unfortunately, and I have found no remedy: (will arrange to further improve anyway. Thanks Lo so, bisogna considerare che l'erba frontale soffriva del classico blur dovuto alla velocità della vettura si è reso necessario anche per due paletti sfuocati che erano parte di una staccionata che era inevitabile evitare dalla macchina. Non è che prima l'effetto fosse più nitido. Era completamente sfuocato stile "blur", quindi mi limiterò a evitare che si vedano le parti clonate, ma non potrò evitare di più purtroppo, e non ho trovato nessun rimedio :( Provvederò a migliorarla ulteriormente comunque. Grazie |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |