Rose fire 2 | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Still Life

24.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

macro e flora View gallery (17 photos)

Rose fire 2 sent on February 05, 2018 (14:09) by Flavio Fuga. 9 comments, 963 views.

, 1/800 f/2.0, ISO 100, hand held. Venezia, Italy.

Seriale obiettivo N° 6368616. Alluminio (colore argento) e vetro. Due adattatori: 1 con attacco a vite m39 verso leica M e uno da attacco leica M verso sony E (FE). Al posto di quest'ultimo, si potrebbe usare un adattatore del tipo "close focus", elicoidale per variare in modo più ravvicinato, la minima distanza di messa a fuoco di questo obiettivo che è di ca. 1 metro.

View High Resolution 24.0 MP

5 persons like it: Mauro Monesi, Mauro66, Phshoot, S.Olivier, Stefania Saffioti

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Mauro66

sent on February 13, 2018 (21:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful picture
remarkable
hello Mauro.

Flavio Fuga

sent on February 14, 2018 (9:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Mauro, it is interesting to use these old vintage lenses from time to time. Thank you for your intervention. Hi, Flavio.

Phshoot

sent on March 15, 2018 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Flavio! Excuse me the question: why two adapters? (One with m39 screw attachment towards leica M and one from leica M attack towards sony E (FE)).
You can also use a ring from M39 to M42 and an adapter M42 sony E ???

Flavio Fuga

sent on March 17, 2018 (19:03)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Una simile questione me l'ero posta anch' io e la risposta che mi sono dato si evince in parte dalla nota alla foto: scegliendo m39 con attacco verso leica m, posso conservare questo primo adattatore sostituendo il secondo (Leica m ----->Sony e) con un "close focus adapter" elicoidale (costoso) che riduce la distanza minima di messa a fuoco di un obiettivo che ce l'ha troppo lunga. Allo stato attuale delle cose, questi "adattatori di distanza ravvicinata" vengono prodotti per adattare ottiche con attacco leica-M (Voigtlander, Zeiss, Leica) a fotocamere mirroless senza specchio verso attacchi (mount) proprietari siano essi per 4/3 per aps-c o per full frame. Avrei potuto usare un solo adattatore da m39 verso Sony-e ma l'idea è quella di acquistare un giorno un voigtlander elicoidale (lm---->E-mount) usato o nuovo per sostituirlo a quello standard da 10 euro che non permette la riduzione della minima distanza di messa a fuoco di questo o di altro obiettivo. Non vedo il motivo di usare un adattatore m42 dal momento che né ottica in questione né corpo macchina usato per la foto possiedono questo tipo di attacco a vite. Ottiche con attacco m42 necessitano di un adattatore più lungo per essere usate verso attacco Sony-e/fe. Bilanciamento, compattezza e ottimizzazione e di ciò che un'obiettivo vintage come questo può ancora dare. Grazie di essere passato e alla prossima! Ciao, Flavio

Flavio Fuga

sent on March 17, 2018 (19:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ultimately, if I had to buy eg. a Jupiter 11 would buy it with an m39 attack rather than an m42 attack, because I would have a more compact set. Hi, Flavio

Phshoot

sent on March 17, 2018 (20:06) | This comment has been translated

Thanks Flavio ! ;-)

Flavio Fuga

sent on May 04, 2018 (19:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think but I'm not sure that for MFT do not make it. Correct if I'm wrong (I mean the close focus adaptor). Hello.

Nico.les55

sent on August 23, 2020 (10:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful image that fully reflects all the beauty of the rose, a greeting, nicolò

Flavio Fuga

sent on August 24, 2020 (17:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Nicolò!
People to make your acquaintance! Thank you for the compliment :-) Friendly Greetings, Flavius

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.