What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 01, 2018 (8:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful mask the light and the pose, but it is very blurred / moved :-( Bella la maschera la luce e la posa, però è molto sfocata/mossa |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (9:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with the idea, but rather confused the result Umberto Concordo buona l'idea ma piuttosto confuso il risultato Umberto |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (10:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I also like the pose and lights, but unfortunately this move is not good. Anche a me piace la posa e luci , ma purtroppo cosi mossa non va bene. |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I deliberately focused only on the front leg. The result is strange but I wanted to try Ho messo a fuoco volutamente solo la gamba frontale. Il risultato è strano ma volevo provare |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But it's not in focus or maybe it's camera shake. Si pero' non è a fuoco o forse è del micromosso. |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:23) | This comment has been translated
ok |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But it's just my impression eh, I do not want to criticize. Ma è solo una mia impressione eh, non voglio per forza criticare. |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I deliberately focused only on the front leg. The result is strange but I wanted to try „ At first I thought of something like that, but honestly I do not understand where the maf has fallen since I do not see anything in focus. Either there was a problem with focusing, or it's a blur problem. Wanting to do a particular shot, personally or I would have chosen to focus on the left foot and blur the rest of the body, or the tattoo on the right leg closing the right to keep the whole tattoo in focus " Ho messo a fuoco volutamente solo la gamba frontale. Il risultato è strano ma volevo provare" All'inizio avevo pensato ad una cosa del genere, ma sinceramente io non capisco dove sia caduta la maf dato che non vedo nulla a fuoco. O c'e' stato un problema di messa a fuoco, oppure è un problema di mosso. Volendo fare un inquadratura particolare , personalmente o avrei scelto di mettere a fuoco il piede sinistro e sfuocare tutto il resto del corpo, oppure il tatuaggio sulla gamba destra chiudendo il giusto per tenere a fuoco tutto il tatuaggio |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Everything you say is all right. I was interested in doing tests with long time and focal open so there is some rough and is not clear. The result I find it anyway interesting in any way. From the same set I loaded another one, let's say, normal. Maybe you like it better. E' tutto corretto quello che dite. Mi interessava fare delle prove con tempi lunghi e focale aperta quindi c'è del mosso e non risulta nulla nitido. Il risultato lo trovo comunque in qualche modo interessante. Dallo stesso set ne ho caricata una altra, diciamo, normale. Magari quella vi piace di più. |
| sent on February 02, 2018 (9:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the idea is there but the result is blurred / moved
however the old version Fishball always deserves! l'idea c'è ma il risultato è sfocato/mosso comunque la Fishball vecchia versione merita sempre! |
| sent on February 02, 2018 (16:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the idea is really beautiful. In my opinion it was too long veramente bella l'idea. Secondo me era con un tempo troppo lungo |
| sent on February 02, 2018 (16:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oh well maybe there is nothing crystal clear that adds atmosphere, a soft photo of David Hamilton. I do not really like the bent leg. But the mask, disturbing, is not cat woman, what a devil is? Vabbé forse che non ci sia nulla di nitidissimo non fa che aggiungere atmosfera, una foto flou alla David Hamilton. Non mi piace molto la gamba piegata. Ma la maschera, inquietante, non è cat woman, che diavolessa è? |
| sent on February 02, 2018 (18:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ But the mask, disturbing, is not cat woman, what a devil is? „
It's a rabbit mask. I can not tell you more :) " Ma la maschera, inquietante, non è cat woman, che diavolessa è?" E' una maschera da coniglio. Non so dirti di più :) |
| sent on February 02, 2018 (18:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As I see it, the blur is a value added to the image!
I open my eyes, I turn my head and in a daze I find myself in front of this figure, this scene, not clear but altered by my lack of mental clarity!
Congratulations beautiful shot, just the leg folded in a way not really natural. Good evening Luca Per come la vedo io il mosso é un valore aggiunto all'immagine! Apro gli occhi, mi gira la testa e in stato confusionale mi ritrovo davanti questa figura, questa scena, non nitida ma alterata dalla mia poca lucidità mentale! Complimenti scatto bellissimo, unico appunto la gamba piegata in modo non proprio naturale. Buona serata Luca |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |