What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 01, 2018 (9:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A processing that in my opinion is not good for the subject. Personal opinion Una elaborazione che a mio parere non va bene per il soggetto. Parere personale |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello. I'm interested in knowing how you would have interpreted it. What cut would you give him? Ciao. Mi interessa sapere come l'avresti interpretata. Che taglio gli avresti dato? |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For me the picture is fine, ok the point of recovery, ok laying, so you did a good job.
Does not it seem right to the graphics processing: nik Google software? It makes the skin ugly and blurred.
If you see there is also a large and unsightly black spot under the thigh of the model.
Hello ;-) Per me la foto va benissimo, ok il punto di ripresa, ok la posa, quindi hai fatto un buon lavoro.
Non mi pare giusta l'elaborazione grafica: nik software Google? Rende brutta la pelle e lo sfocato.
Se vedi c'è anche una grossa e antiestetica chiazza nera sotto la coscia della modella.
ciao  |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I understood that we were talking about post production. In fact I meant that cut you would have given to the post production, not to the shot.
“ nik software Google? „ I do not understand.
The black patch under the thigh is a tattoo. Avevo capito si parlasse di post produzione. Infatti intendevo che taglio avresti dato alla post produzione, non allo scatto.
" nik software Google?" Non capisco.
La chiazza nera sotto la coscia è un tatuaggio. |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (14:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok, sorry, I misunderstood.
Anyway: I should see the original but the pose is not aggressive, so maybe I would try to soften it all, maybe I would have reduced the clarity in the camera raw (-20) saturating a little 'green or turning it into the colors of autumn.
I'm not opposed to tattoos but in the shadows it disturbs a lot if it's not clear what it is, so maybe it's better to open the shadows
//www.google.com/nikcollection/] nik Google software Ok, scusa, avevo capito male.
Comunque: dovrei vedere l'originale ma la posa non è aggressiva, quindi forse avrei cercando di ammorbidire il tutto, magari avrei ridotto la chiarezza in camera raw (-20) saturando un po' il verde oppure trasformandolo nei colori dell'autunno.
Non sono contrario ai tatuaggi ma li in ombra disturba parecchio se non è chiaro cos'è, quindi magari conviene un po' aprire le ombre
nik software Google |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (15:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The composition is beautiful, as well as the lights, but the post, I imagine both HDR, in my opinion does not give merit to the photographer or the model, moreover the tattoo is perceived as a stain.
If you have taken in raw try a different post because the shot in if it deserves.
Umberto La composizione è bella, così come le luci, ma la post, immagino sia HDR, secondo me non rende merito ne al fotografo ne alla modella, inoltre il tatuaggio si percepisce come una macchia.
Se hai scattati in raw prova una diversa post perché lo scatto in se merita.
Umberto |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (15:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quite right.
This is a shot of 2015. I do not think that today I would post it this way Giusto.
Questo è uno scatto del 2015. Non credo che oggi l'avrei post prodotto in questo modo |
| sent on February 01, 2018 (16:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
OK
Umberto OK
Umberto |
| sent on February 04, 2018 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As editing for me it is slightly better, but as a pose by far I prefer this Come editing per me è leggermente meglio, ma come posa di gran lunga preferisco questa |
user75655 | sent on April 07, 2018 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The development I do not like it, I don't know maybe you overdid it with clarity. Even the pose I like, it seems that the model you're sniffing the underarm:-o:-o Lo sviluppo non mi piace proprio, non so forse hai esagerato con la chiarezza. Nemmeno la posa mi piace, sembra che la modella si stia annusando l'ascella  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
