scale of the Turks 2

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

16.5 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Paesaggi View gallery (6 photos)

scale of the Turks 2 sent on January 13, 2018 (21:30) by Salvolaverde. 2 comments, 377 views.

at 18mm, 1/5 f/22.0, ISO 100, tripod. Scala dei turchi, Italy.

View High Resolution 16.5 MP

5 persons like it: EnricoGili, Franco Iannello, Pucci Mirti della Valle, Renzo Fermo, Sergio Fiorenti

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Giovanni Azzi

sent on January 14, 2018 (14:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Shot of good potential, but in my humble opinion there are a few 'flaws.
First of all, the horizon in the middle, according to me, was to be avoided. Since the clouds are interesting, it is probably better to sacrifice some of the lower part including the vegetation.
The diaphragm closed so did lose detail and did not need to close it so much because there was no need to do long exposure (there was still too much light and if necessary an ND filter) nor to accentuate the star of the sun (the star of 16-35 is mythical and already well defined also af / 11 for example).
The exposure could probably be kept a little 'less since it lost detail in the clouds. Given the fair capacity & agrAve; recovery of 6D in my opinion preferable to expose less and recover a little shadows.
Good afternoon!

Salvolaverde

sent on January 14, 2018 (15:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thank you so much John ... you did a very good analysis absolutely shareable !!!! actually I arrived a little late that morning and then I managed to make a few shots in a very hectic and, as already said, I fully share your analysis ... thanks a lot of the passage :-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.