What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 15, 2018 (19:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
bellina! maybe scanned a little roughly! however, the car (which I also use and adore) and also the lens! bellina! forse scannerizzata un po grossolanamente! comunque figa la macchina (che anche io uso ed adoro) e pure l'obiettivo! |
| sent on January 15, 2018 (20:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like it, I have three Carthusian cats. From my grandfather on, I breed cats ;-) Technical comments I do not, for incapacity. Hello Daniel from FB- Mi piace, ho tre gatti certosini. Da mio nonno in poi, allevo gatti  Commenti tecnici non ne faccio, per incapacità. Ciao Daniele da FB- |
| sent on January 16, 2018 (9:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you! The fp4 I developed it with the mono tank of ars imago, which leads to a more accentuated grain and strong contrast. At the moment I find myself with the scanner broken, and then this scan has made the laboratory ... But I'm interested in relatively, my main interest is always print in the darkroom. The scan is just to share ;-) Grazie! La fp4 l'ho sviluppata con il monobagno di ars imago,che porta ad avere una grana più accentuata e forte contrasto. Al momento mi trovo con lo scanner rotto,e quindi questa scansione l'ha fatta il laboratorio... Ma mi interessa relativamente,il mio interesse principale è sempre stampare in camera oscura. La scansione è solo per condividere ;-) |
| sent on January 16, 2018 (14:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree!!! can I ask you how you are with the "mono-bathroom" of the Ars imagine? Concordo!!! posso chiderti come ti trovi con il "monobagno" della Ars immago? |
| sent on January 16, 2018 (17:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I tried it for the first time with this roll of curiosity, I have always developed "traditionally".
It is not bad as a system, especially indicated for those who are beginners in my opinion. Not only for the ease of using a single bath, also for the great flexibility in the development temperature (tolerance 20-25 degrees!). As I wrote the negatives came very mixed, but I read that it happens particularly with the fp4, with the hp5 for example say that the results are better. I wait for an order of films that I have to get there this week and I'll try the hp5 with this development. With the aforementioned order, I must also get the card, I was left without and still I could not try to print these negatives. All in all it did not disappoint me, but the traditional system is obviously preferable. L'ho provato per la prima volta con questo rullino per curiosità,ho sempre sviluppato "tradizionalmente".
Non è malvagio come sistema,indicato particolarmente per chi è alle prime armi secondo me. Non solo per la facilità di usare un solo bagno,anche per la grande flessibilità nella temperatura di sviluppo (tolleranza 20-25 gradi!). Come ho scritto i negativi sono venuti molto contrastati,ma ho letto che succede particolarmente con la fp4,con la hp5 per esempio dicono che i risultati siano migliori. Aspetto un ordine di pellicole che mi deve arrivare in settimana e proverò la hp5 con questo sviluppo. Con il suddetto ordine mi deve arrivare anche la carta,sono rimasto senza e ancora non ho potuto provare a stampare questi negativi. Tutto sommato non mi ha deluso,ma il sistema tradizionale resta ovviamente preferibile. |
| sent on January 16, 2018 (17:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'd be curious to see some nice prints! I'm starting to get closer now, but in general the quality I've seen is really high!
However for the development it was only curiosity, I prefer the "classic" 3 step :-D
Sarei curioso di vedere delle belle stampe! Io sto iniziando ora ad avvicinarmi, ma in generale la qualità che ho visto è davvero alta!
Comunque per lo sviluppo era solo curiosità, preferisco il "classico" a 3 step 
|
| sent on January 16, 2018 (18:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, I also tried it out of curiosity. But with the traditional one you definitely have better results ;-) Si,io pure l'ho provato per curiosità. Ma con quello tradizionale hai sicuramente risultati migliori ;-) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
