What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user92328 | sent on February 03, 2018 (18:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great estate iso ..: -o but also lights and colors ... Tenuta iso fantastica.. ma anche luci e colori... |
user65671 | sent on May 19, 2018 (22:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
True, very beautiful. But you could also make it to 1/4 on tripod with higher sharpness, less grain and more faithful colors. I absolutely do not want to criticize your photos and your style. just wanted to point out that sometimes shooting at high ISO becomes a shortcut and that you should not abuse it. I reacted with my opinion because it seems exaggerated the importance that is given to the fact that perhaps the A7III has half a EV of advantage over the ISO quality A7RIII. Obviously is my personal opinion and I do not want to teach anything to anyone, I only comes to mind when for weddings in church I used film from 400 ASA and I did not pull, because the grits seemed to be a stone's throw. Vero, molto bella. Ma potevi farla anche a 1/4 su cavalletto con nitidezza più elevata, meno grana e colori più fedeli. Non voglio assolutamente criticare le tue foto e il tuo stile. Volevo solo sottolineare che a volte scattare ad alti iso diventa una scorciatoia e che non si dovrebbe abusarne. Ho reagito col mio parere perché mi sembra esagerata l'importanza che si dà al fatto che forse la A7iii ha mezzo ev di vantaggio rispetto la A7Riii di qualità iso. Ovviamente è il mio parere personale e non voglio insegnare nulla a nessuno, mi viene solo in mente quando per matrimoni in chiesa usavo pellicola da 400 asa e non la tiravo, perché atrimenti la grana sembrava pallini di schioppo. |
| sent on May 19, 2018 (22:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Scalanc is made on tripod. is a pixel shift, ergo essential tripod. The 6400 come out of the fact that I had forgotten the machine on autoiso, and I had not set the 100. As a result of testing for pixel shift, has become a test for high ISO. ;-) Scalanc è fatta su cavalletto. Trattasi di pixel shift, ergo cavalletto indispensabile. I 6400 vengono fuori dal fatto che mi ero scordato la macchina su autoiso, e non avevo impostato i 100. Di conseguenza da test per il pixel shift, è diventato un test per gli alti ISO. |
user65671 | sent on May 19, 2018 (22:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With the pixel shift the high ISO improve? Con il pixel shift gli alti ISO migliorano? |
| sent on May 19, 2018 (23:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Probably the noise is reduced, the PS being the fusion of four different shots. Artifacts I have not seen, even if in reality for the random distribution of noise, the shots are not exactly the same. But in any case the sense of the shot was not that, but a qualitative comparison between the A7R3 and the sd4h. There is also a PS to 2500iso. Probabilmente il rumore viene ridotto, essendo il PS la fusione di quattro scatti diversi. Artefatti non ne ho visti, anche se in realtà per la distribuzione casuale del rumore, gli scatti non sono perfettamente uguali. Ma in ogni caso il senso dello scatto non era quello, ma un confronto qualitativo tra la a7r3 e la sd4h. C'è anche un PS a 2500iso. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |