What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 16, 2012 (16:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It seems to me that the focus is not precise, since the detail I get a little 'muddy. Mi sembra che la messa a fuoco non sia precisa, dato che il dettaglio mi appare un po' impastato. |
| sent on October 16, 2012 (17:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Pigi47! Maybe I closed the aperture too because in those made f18 seem less mix. Ciao Pigi47!forse ho chiuso troppo il diaframma perchè in quelle fatte a f18 sembrano meno impastate. |
| sent on October 16, 2012 (20:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Acceleration at the top, I would have only required a bit more older.
Eye stain of the sensor.
I agree on trying to produce the post with F/18, I think the maf is the loss is too close to the diaphragm, the tamron as the sigma works fine until f/16 then a bit of a decline.
Very good photo!
HELLO Ripresa al top, l'avrei solo tenuta un pelo più sù.
Occhio alle macchie del sensore.
Concordo sul provare a post produrre quella con f/18, secondo me la maf c'è la perdita è per il diaframma troppo chiuso, il tamron come il sigma lavora bene fino a f/16 poi ha un pò un calo.
Buonissima foto!
CIAO |
| sent on October 16, 2012 (20:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I anchio the shot there is, I would try to revise the post. I mean I would give a little more light colors and have a scaldatina especially less sharpening as well as remove the stains of the sensor.
Hello ;-) Penso anchio che lo scatto ci sia, io proverei a rivedere la post. Nel senso darei un filo di luce in più una scaldatina hai colori e sopratutto meno maschera di contrasto oltre che togliere le macchie del sensore.
Ciao |
| sent on October 16, 2012 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello eragon quoto Sun above the good shooting there 'but is better evaluated. hello flavio ciao eragon quoto il buon dom qui sopra lo scatto c'e' ma va meglio valutato. ciao flavio |
| sent on October 16, 2012 (22:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Guys thanks for the advice! This evening I had a walk in the garden and I found other Pontia Edusa to photograph trying to improve thanks to your advice, but with the sensor as I hope it is only dirt on the lens help! Ragazzi grazie per i consigli! Questa sera ho fatto un giretto in giardino e ho trovato altre Pontia edusa da fotografare cercando di migliorare ancora grazie ai vostri consigli,ma con il sensore come faccio spero che sia solo sporcizia sull'obiettivo aiuto! |
| sent on October 17, 2012 (8:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You're getting better at sight:-D ;-)
Sebastian you find yourself with some very nice people. the spots are due to accumulated dust on the sensor at f22 you should see all the clone ps, f 22 to the detail tends to fall apart, I'll tell you from experience that already from f10 to f16 could still have everything in focus without the appearance of that annoying grain, try to always use ISO 100 and if you can use a Plamp to minimize vibration, for the composition test different angles with the tamron can easily turn the single machine, and then snaps snaps snaps so you start to get the bones
practice is your best teacher, hello
Cyrus Stai migliorando a vista d'occhio
Sebastiano ti ritrovi con dei soggetti molto belli. le macchie sono dovute a polvere accumulata sul sensore che ad f22 si vede tutta la dovresti clonare con ps, ad f 22 il dettaglio tende a spappolarsi, per esperienza ti dico che già da f10 a f16 potevi comunque avere tutto a fuoco senza la comparsa di quella fastidiosa grana, cerca di usare sempre iso 100 e se puoi di usare un plamp per limitare al massimo le vibrazioni, per la compo prova diverse angolazioni col tamron puoi girare tranquillamente la sola macchina, e poi scatta scatta scatta cosi cominci a farti le ossa
la pratica è il tuo miglior maestro, ciao
Ciro |
| sent on October 17, 2012 (12:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Ciro Thanks for the advice, for now I dedicate myself to art as soon as I begin to practice with the ps otherwise I'll end up more to ask for advice and become crazy:-D I'll even go mad if I saw my Plamp you would put in laugh, is composed of: clips, a piece or more of cane fixed to the ground or with the fixed peg into a stable base that invented at the time ;-)
I'm having a mess! If you go to my gallery I'm putting more photos fresh fresh. Ciao Ciro!Grazie per i consigli, per ora mi dedico alla tecnica appena posso inizierò a fare pratica con ps altrimenti non la finirò più di chiedere consigli e diventerò matto anzi vi farò diventare matti,se vedessi il mio plamp ti metteresti a ridere, è composto:mollette,un pezzo o più di canna che fisso al terreno o con una molletta la fisso in una base stabile che invento al momento
Mi sto divertendo un casino!Se vai nella mia galleria sto inserendo altre foto fresche fresche. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
8.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
