What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 21, 2017 (0:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And you think that the sony is also more resolving .. E tu pensa che il sony è pure più risolvente.. |
| sent on December 21, 2017 (0:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You say? Well ... I have to try it. From raw that Karmal had passed me, no ... Dici? Mah...devo provarlo. Dai raw che mi aveva passato Karmal, no... |
user92328 | sent on December 23, 2017 (19:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The sony on Dxo from 36 while the canon 24 Mpx ... the difference is really so, impossible to tamper with the data so much, as some think that the data are not true Dxo ..
Perhaps the best thing would be to ask oneself what does the difference between 36 and 24 actually affect? That is, in terms of visual perception to the naked eye if it is detectable and of how much ??
However, for me these 5 thousand iso remain spectacular .... !! :-or
Instead, could you tell me what you think of the yield of this lens, or at least how far it is from the evening of a, for example, 90mm macro or other optics at the top of sharpen on the same focal length, about 100mm .. ?? Thank you right away, and this below is the link of the photo I uploaded just to understand where it comes ... Happy Holidays ..
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=2614877&l=it Il sony su Dxo da 36 mentre che il canon da 24 Mpx... la differenza è davvero tanta, impossibile manomettere cosi tanto i dati, come qualcuno pensa che non sono veritieri i dati Dxo..
Forse la cosa migliore sarebbe chiedersi cosa incide nel concreto quella differenza tra 36 a 24..? Cioè, in termini di percezione visiva ad occhio nudo se è rilevabile e di quanto..??
Comunque, per me questi 5 mila iso rimangono spettacolari....!!
Invece, potreste dirmi cosa ne pensate della resa di questa ottica, o perlomeno quanto sia distante di un 90mm macro, o di altre ottiche al top per sharpen sulla stessa focale, all'incirca sui 100mm..?? Ringrazio sin da subito, e questo sotto è il link della foto che ho caricato, proprio per capire a che punto arriva... Buone Feste..
www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=2614877&l=it |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
