There is no ... | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

6.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Macro e Flora View gallery (15 photos)

There is no ... sent on October 14, 2012 (17:35) by Sturlacchio. 3 comments, 1140 views.

, 1/100 f/5.6, ISO 200, tripod.

View High Resolution 6.0 MP

8 persons like it: Afrikachiara, Alessandro Cirillo, Davide Flamini, Giancarlo Di Miceli, Gianfranco Fontana, Mautizio, Michela Checchetto, Pittula

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Pigi47

sent on October 15, 2012 (18:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

From my point of view I find it not very aesthetic everything blurred in the foreground relegating drops a little 'sharper, in a second floor and the other in the corner. Better a smaller aperture and anticipate the focus on the drop in the foreground playing then vanish according to the pdc.

Maxspin73

sent on October 15, 2012 (20:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Unlike Pigi find pleasant choice to leave the MAF diagonally in the center of the frame, but I think it's a matter of taste of the beholder. Often blurred in the foreground give'' nuisance'' but, again, it depends on mere personal taste. Here I find the image in its being so well balanced for my taste there is.

Congratulations!

Sturlacchio

sent on October 15, 2012 (20:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

L 'idea has been to bring a minimum plan MAF along the grain of the transverse leaf. It is a true macro, and in fact the MAF was obtained by micrometric slide with the objective fixed on the ratio 1:1. With an aperture more closed I would have less blurred, perhaps to look at the real noise may well be in the big drop blurry on the right side. :-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.