RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Artistic Nude
  4. » Giorgia 2

 



ATTENTION! This gallery shows artistic nude photos, included full frontal nude, both male and female. DO NOT visit this gallery if:

1) You don't are at least 18 years old.

2) You get easily annoyed by nude photos (the definition of 'artistic nude' is rather subjective, so some photos may be unpleasing).

3) Do not visit this section if you want to see only good photos: as for every gallery, the quality of the photos goes from excellent to very bad.



If you are over 18 and you want to see these photos, click here.


To save your preference, join JuzaPhoto!



Nudo

View gallery (9 photos)

Giorgia 2 sent on October 12, 2012 (22:20) by Ducio. 21 comments, 6678 views. [retina]

at 138mm, 1/320 f/6.3, ISO 1000,


View High Resolution 6.0 MP  



Attention: the definition of 'artistic nude' is very subjective and some photos may look inappropriate.

If you don't want to see the photos or this user, click here: ignore this user


PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on October 12, 2012 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The pose and expression of the model is not go, the area on the left side, as opposed to the right, disturbs. Good light that seems only natural.

avatarjunior
sent on October 12, 2012 (23:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

On the contrary I like the pose that is the expression of the model! Confirm a good light ;-)

user9538
avatar
sent on October 13, 2012 (1:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

MR71 light is not natural, there is a Softbox with a flash positioned precisely on the right ;-)
(Whether I'm wrong, I apologize in advance) ehehe

avatarjunior
sent on October 13, 2012 (9:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

nice composition great light, beautiful model, but in my humble opinion the choice of socks is wrong not streamline the legs, or the point of recovery from this effect.

avatarsenior
sent on October 13, 2012 (9:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Bad (almost) everything: the model is squat, stockings routes are poverty, the setting is a middle ground between the research and the nature of the destroyed plants (back), especially the model's face is too red in comparison to the skin of the body.

Let's say that I like the outline of the door.

avatarsupporter
sent on October 13, 2012 (12:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

setting and colors that complement MODELA very balanced, very nice MODELA

avatarsenior
sent on October 13, 2012 (16:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I only lay not "appropriate" ... : In a state of decay of the building and of the place siguaramente a waiting attitude leaning against one of the two uprights would be definitely better. I find it unethical to define a model, "squat" .. I understand that senyor are accustomed to excellence but .... from here to define everything goes bad there.


avatarsenior
sent on October 13, 2012 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Wally is an opinion ... photos are posted for opinions, mine is this.
Ah, you write "senior", and in this context is meaningless ...
And then the model is really stubby, short legs and neck, and this contrasts with the laying slender.

user8022
avatar
sent on October 14, 2012 (6:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the model is low ... I took ... abbassandomi short neck .. I would look to the model one corner of the door at the top ... these are my ideas

user6021
avatar
sent on October 14, 2012 (7:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Alvar ... after it has been called the "squat" with her you have no hope:-D
But in all seriousness, I'm not an expert in naked, but maybe I would have put the model in a different pose, I would have made to support one of the two pillars of the door as he said Wally ..... Luckily the world is beautiful because it is different:-D

user2904
avatar
sent on October 14, 2012 (12:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sometimes it is difficult to reconcile sincere criticism with tact and good manners: fconfuso:
I really like the setting and the colors.

avatarsupporter
sent on October 14, 2012 (20:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the model is low ... I took ... abbassandomi short neck .. I would look to the model one corner of the door at the top ...
I agree, definitely not the sock route go, I will nonetheless naked I will not even for a second and then put good model is ... I do not even look as bad as the means to pass someone in my house it says "I am made much worse":-D:-D

avatarsenior
sent on October 15, 2012 (9:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Oh, I write what I honestly think of what is shown.
I do it politely trying to explain WHY 'the thing I do not like.
And the criticism of others seems to me to be one of the reasons why I post photos, otherwise you post (as small as postage stamps, in order to minimize any defects) flickr or fotoarts, where all hail all.

From here to afford to criticize "touch and education", ricky, he spends a lot '.
Limited to comment / criticize the photos and forget about me.
I would have written you anmche in MP, but since you've written publicly, as I say.

As for the model: we are talking about nude photos, the attempt to find the contrast between the "beautiful", morbidezzza the body of a woman, and the collapse of'Setting ... In this case, the model MUST be extremely fine, beautiful, elegant, slender.
Otherwise the contrast is reduced.

What then, in absolute terms, this is a pretty good girl ... I agree (do not go on the anatomical details to motivate), but in my opinion, NOT 'nice enough to take pictures of naked just to clarify if I found her in the room tonight certainly not send her away, if I had to pay a woman for fotogafarla naked, I would choose another.

avatarsenior
sent on October 15, 2012 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Not bad ...

avatarsenior
sent on October 15, 2012 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I find it absurd and alien to a competent forum of nude photography the problem of beauty or not the girl.
There 'relationship between the beauty of the model and beauty of the photo.
Moth is right when he says that and 'the photographer must know how to get the best out of the model in relation to its photographic project, and based on this model should be chosen as a body, skills' and experience (but not' not easy).
Alvar is right when he says that this photo was necessary to model physically more 'sleek and stylish with a shutter (and here we must be the help and' indication of the photographer).

avatarsenior
sent on October 28, 2012 (11:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

sincerely nude photos of this type just do not like .... it seems appropriate to take a pretty girl any ... tell her to undress and take .... the nude photos in my opinion should enhance the body lines with skillful play of light and shadows ... should not be only photos of naked girls ..

avatarjunior
sent on October 28, 2012 (12:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If I may, the installation is not suited to the context as the sock route.
Using that location with the clothes I put the model on one side or squatting or sitting leaning on the door with long legs on one side, a nice drop of black makeup as if the model had been seduced and abandoned, sicuremente must not look in machine, a spottino only on particular facial or even ambient light and then I would not see all its nakedness' .... in this case you can tear even more 'the sock and certainly would have been more' "artistic" or at least aimed at a theme ....
obviously not a professional ...
greetings

avatarjunior
sent on October 28, 2012 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I instead of the stockings would have chosen in this case of the socks below the knee or just above ... are equally sexy and revealing a slender thigh would more be a model.
However, the basic idea and the colors I like.
I'm not a photographer, so I apologize for my humble opinion:-D
Good photos!
Michela

avatarjunior
sent on November 11, 2012 (10:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It 'been a while.
I would say especially ALVAR MAYOR (George).
I put the photos, not to be criticized, big word, to have opinions, whatever they may be, but always with the constructive spirit.
I never stop learning, I like who can make me understand my mistakes and possible improvements.
Dear George, I have a little 'pissed off the pot, as they say in my part.
The first, if not the main rule, be required to assess any work of art, including photography, is: the total disregard for the subject.
Your squat about being aggressive and not suitable for nude photos, you're not following the rule.
The beautiful story and beautiful photography are very different things, what matters is not the subject, but the wayrepresent it.
I think I explained.
I wanted to as well, because you have not understood what I meant to represent: the brutal, real, passionate, engaging, environmental degradation, marginalization, dependence on vice (the face is red from drunkenness), despair.
I did not mean to oppose a degraded environment, the elegance of a perfect body, indeed.
You could also save you an appreciation for the girl for other reasons, I would like to talk about photography and other topics or sexual preferences.
Finally, I was taught that before accepting "critical" need to see from that pulpit preaching is done.
I should add that in general, in order to appreciate competently nude photos, you have to do this kind of photography.

user11931
avatar
sent on November 15, 2012 (18:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

honestly nude photos of this type just do not like .... it seems appropriate to take a pretty girl any ... tell her to undress and take .... the nude photos in my opinion should enhance the body lines with skillful play of light and shadows ... should not be only photos of naked girls ..

The building is too shabby, would deserve better!




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me