What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 29, 2017 (21:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You have a nice panorama with a nice warm shade and the right contrast. I feel like it's a bit sx though. Hai fatto una bella panoramica con una gradevole tonalità calda e il giusto contrasto.Mi sembra che penda un po' a sx però. |
| sent on November 29, 2017 (23:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It looks like a photo taken when the sun was low on the horizon, the dominant you gave him I really like.
I would have liked to give it to myself, but when they did, they criticized me :-D
Great work, maybe missing a bit of definition.
Sembra una foto fatta quando il sole era basso sull'orizzonte, la dominante che gli hai dato mi piace molto.
Avrei voluto dargliela anch'io ma quando lo fatto mi hanno criticato
Ottimo lavoro, forse manca un po di definizione.
|
user59947 | sent on November 30, 2017 (18:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful as a photo join Joseb, I see her a bit hot and I do not get so much the part over the sky, for the rest I like bella come foto unite Joseb, la vedo un pochina calda e non mi convince tanto la parte sopra del cielo, per il resto mi piace |
| sent on November 30, 2017 (19:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@FabioSalvatore: I tried to keep the bridge on the left and at the end the distortion of the castle remains. It was not easy to combine the four panoramic photos. There was always something to fix: in the end I threw in the towel !!!
@RobertMarc: You understood my intent to change the shooting time. Thank you. On the definition, I have not traced on the unsharp mask: perhaps, I could dare a little more ....
@Ardian: Hahaha, the upper part of the sky is completely rebuilt to avoid the crushing of the castle: I wanted to give a little more air than the original shot.
Thank you all for the ride !!! @FabioSalvatore: ho tentato di tenere dritto il ponte a sx ed alla fine la distorsione del castello rimane. Non è stato per nulla semplice unire le quattro foto in panoramica. C'era sempre qualcosa da aggiustare: alla fine ho gettato la spugna !!!
@RobertMarc: Hai compreso il mio intento di modificare l'orario di scatto. Grazie. Sulla definizione, non ho calcato sulla maschera di contrasto: forse, potevo osare un po' di più....
@Ardian: Hahaha, la parte superiore del cielo è integralmente ricostruita per evitare lo schiacciamento del castello: volevo dare un po' più di aria rispetto allo scatto originale.
Grazie a tutti per il passaggio !!! |
| sent on November 30, 2017 (20:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice work .... my compliments ... Bel lavoro....i miei complimenti... |
| sent on November 30, 2017 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Roberto for the appreciation. :-P Grazie Roberto per l'apprezzamento.  |
| sent on December 01, 2017 (0:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To resize the photo while leaving the definition unchanged, I use the method suggested by Juza. ;-)
Filter - Better contrast - Factor 150 - radius 0.2
Resize 50%
Filter - Better contrast - Factor 50 - radius 0.2
Save for Web Per ridimensionare la foto lasciando inalterata la definizione, utilizzo il metodo suggerito da Juza.
Filtro - Contrasta migliore - Fattore 150 - raggio 0,2
Ridimensiona 50%
Filtro - Contrasta migliore - Fattore 50 - raggio 0,2
Salva per Web |
| sent on December 01, 2017 (19:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ah .... so double passage with different factors ....
I have to try.
Thanks RobertMarc ;-) ah.... quindi doppio passaggio con fattori differenti....
Devo provarci.
Grazie RobertMarc |
| sent on December 01, 2017 (20:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Even for me a little 'too red and you notice the cloning of the sky and, if desired, the shadow on the right. Composition and exposure ok. Anche per me un po' troppo rossa e si nota il clonaggio del cielo e, volendo, dell'ombra sulla destra. Composizione e esposizione ok. |
user59947 | sent on December 01, 2017 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Robert, what are those numbers? ? @Robert, cosa sono quei numeri? ? |
| sent on December 01, 2017 (21:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Adrian, In Photoshop - filter - contrasts better
The numbers are the settings to be set.
It is explained better on Juza's post, I look for the link ...
@Adrian, In Photoshop - filtro - contrasta migliore
I numeri sono le impostazioni da mettere.
È spiegato meglio sul post di Juza, cerco il collegamento...
|
| sent on December 02, 2017 (11:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@AndreaDG: on the cloning I have a long way to go despite the tutorials I follow .....
Thank you for picking me up. @AndreaDG: sul clonaggio ho molta strada da fare malgrado i tutorial che seguo.....
Grazie per il passaggio. |
| sent on December 02, 2017 (11:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With such a flat sky it did not even need to clone; it was enough to sample the color on another layer and blend the junction point a little with a mask or rubber. To make the fussy we added the trouble to make it uniform to the rest of the photo et voila. Con un cielo così piatto non serviva nemmeno clonare; bastava campionare il colore su un altro livello e sfumare un po' il punto di giunzione con una maschera o con la gomma. A fare i pignoli ci aggiungevi del disturbo per uniformarla al resto della foto et voilà. |
user59947 | sent on December 02, 2017 (12:23) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Robert |
| sent on December 03, 2017 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@AndreaDG: I tried your suggestion with the sampling blurring the junction but it does not seem consistent (unless you're wrong something) ....
@RobertMark: used the double pass and save for Web system:
@AndreaDG: ho provato il tuo suggerimento con il campionamento sfumando la giunzione ma non mi sembra coerente (a meno che non sbagli qualcosa)....
@RobertMark: utilizzato il sistema di doppio passaggio e salvataggio per Web:
|
| sent on December 03, 2017 (11:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Joseb would have been done before other interventions because now there are more details that in the raw were 'latent' and no longer being the uniform sky you notice the detachment. @Joseb sarebbe stato da fare prima di altri interventi perché ora ci sono dei dettagli in più che nel raw erano 'latenti' e non essendo più il cielo uniforme si nota lo stacco. |
| sent on December 03, 2017 (11:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I am in the middle of the sea, as I return to look at it
8-) ;-) Sono in mezzo al mare, come rientro la guardo
 |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
1.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
