What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 28, 2017 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good idea, albeit unreadable, I probably would blur with more sweetness :-P Idea buona,anche se poco leggibile,probabilmente avrei sfocato con più dolcezza |
user72446 | sent on November 28, 2017 (13:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I confirm how read above! too chaotic, at least that was not the basic idea! confermo quanto letto sopra! troppo caos, almeno che quella non era l'idea di base! |
| sent on November 28, 2017 (16:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Personally, I find my hand under my eyes, without focusing on the viewfinder Personalmente trovo che la mano sotto disturba lo sguardo, senza mi sarei concentrato sul mirino |
| sent on November 28, 2017 (17:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's a special photo, a nice experiment but maybe in fact a bit too chaotic :) E' una foto particolare, un bel esperimento ma forse in effetti un pò troppo caotica :) |
| sent on November 28, 2017 (20:49) | This comment has been translated
Thank you all! |
| sent on November 28, 2017 (20:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quto Allansavigni, the shadow of the hand is the only element of disturbance to a well-made picture ;-) David Quto Allansavigni, l'ombra della mano è l'unico elemento di disturbo a una foto ben realizzata Davide |
| sent on November 29, 2017 (23:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The idea is captivating and the title is very impressive. Beautiful composition. However, I would have worked more on the focus that does not seem optimal. Difficult to take a shot and therefore greater commitment. It wanted a tripod absolutely! Hello Paul L'idea è accattivante e il titolo molto suggestivo. Bella la composizione. Tuttavia avrei lavorato di più sulla messa a fuoco che non mi sembra ottimale. Difficile lo scatto e quindi maggiore l'impegno. Ci voleva un treppiedi assolutamente! Ciao Paul |
| sent on November 30, 2017 (8:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know Nikon, but to see the goal: a 24-120 clicking at 120 and f6.7, asking for a blur and a different quality would be almost impossible. Perhaps at f8 / 11, but to go under the times that are already at the limit had to climb iso (I do not know the hold of the d750, but it seems to me to speak very well). In general I like the idea very much. Surely I would try to shoot with a more powerful look, maybe by studying it more by putting the car on the stand, putting it in the room and then seeing what happens :-D Non conosco Nikon, ma a vedere l'obiettivo: un 24-120 scattando a 120 e f6.7, chiedere uno sfuocato e una qualità diversi direi sia quasi impossibile. Forse a f8/11, ma per andare sotto i tempi che già sono al limite doveva salire di iso (non conosco la tenuta della d750, ma mi sembra se ne parli molto bene). In generale a me l'idea piace molto. Sicuramente riproverei lo scatto con un'ottica più performante, magari studiandolo di più mettendo la macchina su cavalletto, mettendo bene a fuoco in camera e poi vedendo cosa succede |
| sent on November 30, 2017 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The idea is pretty, but I agree that it is a bit confusing L'idea è carina, ma la realizzazione concordo sul fatto che sia un po' confusionaria |
| sent on December 01, 2017 (14:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good idea but not flawless realization. Defocused very bad, certainly due to the minimal fluctuation of very reduced MAF. Idea buona ma realizzazione non impeccabile. Sfocato molto brutto, sicuramente dovuto alla discanza minima di MAF molto ridotta. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |