What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 10, 2012 (0:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice, I like it ... finally the natural colors of Camogli ;-) Carina, mi piace...finalmente i colori naturali di Camogli  |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (8:15)
very very nice. |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I seem to read a little 'noise in the sky ... do not you think? mi sembra di leggere un po' di rumore nel cielo... non credi? |
| sent on October 10, 2012 (22:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Of course, you're right, it is true, as well as the thunder ....... However, with a sky so black, a bit of noise but I took it off a little more there is right and good. Why rape always everything with the pp .......... Certo, hai ragione, é vero; oltre a quello dei tuoni.......Comunque, con un cielo così nero, un po di rumore l'ho tolto ma un altro po ci sta giusto e bene. Perchè violentare sempre tutto con la pp.......... |
| sent on January 22, 2013 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
because you took 1/150 iso 200? No noise ... so without resorting to the PP (which however I saw that the clouds would not have negative consequences)
then I would recommend you also ensure that the Campinile is vertical
good light, francesco perché non hai scattato 1/150 iso 200? ...così niente rumore senza ricorrere alla PP (che cmq io farei visto che sulle nuvole non ha conseguenze negative)
poi ti consiglierei anche di far si che il campinile venga verticale
buona luce, francesco |
user19058 | sent on January 22, 2013 (11:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice time and well educated, even the color rendering so ... vibrant.
I love the BN but I love the color and the picture contains both.
So, beyond verticality and noise (which, however if possible I'd rather fix), we gladly I click on a nice 'like'!
GG
PS: quoto the opinion of Fracas on shooting data ... Molto bello il momento e ben colto; anche la resa del colore così ... vibrante.
Amo il BN ma mi piace moltissimo anche il colore, e questa foto li contiene entrambi.
Quindi, al di là di verticalità e rumori (che comunque se possibile preferirei sistemare), ci clicco su volentieri un bel 'mi piace'!
GG
PS: quoto il parere di Fracas sui dati di scatto... |
| sent on February 04, 2013 (17:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Fracas and Blue Skies, (there is no doubt that the bell tower right would be better, they tell me all and continue to straighten eye), you are right to post these comments about the shooting data but ...... I at sea, in a boat with sea far more moved than it looks, I could NOT use more time lento.grazie. giorgio Grazie Fracas e Blue Skies; (non c'é dubbio che il campanile diritto sarebbe meglio, me lo dicono tutti e continuo a raddrizzare a occhio); avete ragione a postare queste osservazioni circa i dati di scatto ma......ero in mare, in barca con mare ben piu mosso di quanto sembri; NON potevo usare tempo piu lento.grazie .giorgio |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
