What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 06, 2017 (13:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful! I like the things minimalist / in series / repetitive.
the only thing I might feel about telling you is that I would have preferred to see the second row of fireplaces rather than the third. my eye was looking for fire there and instead found it behind.
I do not know if it's a matter of mine ;-) bella! a me piacciono molto le cose minimaliste/in serie/ripetitive.
l'unica cosa che forse mi sentirei di dirti è che avrei preferito vedere la seconda fila di sedie a fuoco invece che la terza. il mio occhio lo cercava lì il fuoco e invece l'ha trovato dietro.
non so se è una questione mia personale  |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (13:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I wanted to give more depth, so I focused on the third row Ho voluto dare più il senso di profondità, per questo ho messo a fuoco la terza fila |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (13:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
surely, I imagined that there was a reason for your choice!
we say that since I have a wide screen and there is little to height (the photo is all there, but I have to scroll to remove the header of the site), until I saw the upstairs of the photo, 3 rows plus the second was fine that fire (watch, always IMHO), then I rolled the wheel and I also appeared the first row (or at least the piece that you see) and I thought "pity!" that is also the ahaha certo, immaginavo che ci fosse un motivo per la tua scelta!
diciamo che, siccome ho uno schermo wide e ci sta poco per altezza (la foto ci sta tutta, ma devo scorrere per togliere la testata del sito), fino a quando ho visto la parte alta della foto, 3 fila più la seconda andava bene quel fuoco (attenzione, sempre IMHO), poi ho rollato la rotella e mi è apparsa anche la prima fila (o almeno il pezzetto che si vede) e ho pensato "peccato!" che c'è anche quella ahaha |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (13:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I understand, though, thank you for the suggestion Capito grazie comunque del suggerimento |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (13:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
however, we wait for the "big ones", they will definitely give you the best of them :-D comunque aspettiamo "i grandi", loro sapranno darti dritte sicuramente migliori  |
user72446 | sent on November 06, 2017 (13:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Transmit depth ..... Good post and black and white. As pictures do not inspire me a lot, I appreciate the geometric lines. Trasmette profondità..... Buona la post e il bianco e nero. Come foto non mi ispira molto, ne apprezzo le linee geometriche. |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (15:56) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Emiliano. |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (17:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good black and white, maybe to give strength to the repeated subject you should have cut that left-handed left-hand side that appears empty Buon bianco e nero, forse per dare forza al soggetto ripetuto avresti dovuto tagliare quella parte sinistra senza sedie che appare vuota |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (17:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good black and white, maybe to give strength to the repeated subject you should have cut that left-handed left-hand side that appears empty Buon bianco e nero, forse per dare forza al soggetto ripetuto avresti dovuto tagliare quella parte sinistra senza sedie che appare vuota |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (18:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
There is a plot, there is good redundancy, there is the three-dimensionality; I consider it a great minimal click if inserted in a series that contextualizes it ... so it's a bit lost in my opinion Cè una trama, c'è una buona ridondanza, c'è la tridimensionalità; lo considero un ottimo scatto minimal se inserito in una serie che lo contestualizzi...così è un po' perso a mio parere |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (18:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Filippo grazi, if you see the optional see the sequel Ciao Filippo grazi, se vedi la facoltativa vedi il sequel |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (19:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Had I left the left side in the post I would have to remove some chair Adri se avessi tolo la parte a sinistra in post avrei dovuto eliminare qualche sedia |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (19:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I see ;-) Capisco |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (19:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in my opinion it could have been good there had been symmetry and no voids (top left)
and without the head of the two nearest chairs. good chairs corner almost perfectly at 45 degrees ;-) a mio avviso poteva essere buona ci fosse stata simmetria e senza vuoti (in alto a sinistra)
e senza la testa delle due sedie più vicine. buono l'angolo delle sedie quasi perfettamente a 45 gradi |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (19:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Alessandro for suggestions. Grazie Alessandro dei suggerimenti. |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (22:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A good photo by composition and BW, the only thing that does not convince me is the two blurry chairs in the foreground ... I would try to remove them;)
David Una buona foto per composizione e BW, l'unica cosa che non mi convince sono le due sedie sfuocate in primo piano...proverei a rimuoverle ;)
Davide |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (22:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you David, I try to remove them Grazie Davide, provo a rimuoverle |
| sent on November 07, 2017 (13:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Honestly, I can not tell you, the starting idea is, the issue of central fire leaves me puzzled.
What is the bottom right lower right? Onestamente non saprei dirti, l'idea di partenza ci sta, la questione del fuoco centrale mi lascia perplesso.
Cos'è l'alone in basso a destra? |
| sent on November 07, 2017 (16:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice idea but I would have preferred the fire to fall on the second row and I would have removed the first one. In my opinion, it would have been more "three-dimensional" if that was your intent. Finally, that corner at the top of an xx stops the plot a little. Carina l'idea ma avrei preferito che il fuoco cadesse sulla seconda fila ed avrei rimosso la prima. Secondo me sarebbe stata più "tridimensionale" se quello era il tuo intento. Infine quell'angolo in alto a sx interrompe un po' la trama. |
| sent on November 07, 2017 (16:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Maserc and Razor for suggestions. Grazie Maserc e Razort per i suggerimenti. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
19.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
