What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 10, 2012 (19:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice the subject and composition .. I'd worked the photo in such a way as to highlight more wrinkles ... molto bello il soggetto e la composizione.. io avrei lavorato la foto in maniera tale da far risaltare di più le rughe... |
| sent on October 11, 2012 (10:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@ Ale: thanks, a bit 'of sharpening but I do not like limestone hand, for me it's okay.
@ Memy: look, I forgot the camera set to ISO 800 because I had just come out of a dark hut and in the end I took in 1/2500, with obvious problems of camera shake (which is particularly noticeable in the eyes, as the little woman was not just stops). I posted more to the special subject for the technical perfection of the photo, which is completely missing. the eye drops you right? to me it falls to the left, in spite of the diaphragm was a decent 6.3 the MAF is really shallow and I seem to focus on the lips (of course I aimed the teeth) and on the left cheek of the beholder. @ale: grazie, un po' di aumento di contrasto lo faccio ma non mi piace calcare la mano, per me va bene così.
@memy: guarda, avevo dimenticato la macchina settata su 800 iso perché ero appena uscito da una capanna buia e alla fine ho scattato a 1/2500, con ovvi problemi di mosso (che si notano soprattutto negli occhi, visto che la donnina non stava proprio ferma). l'ho postata più per la particolarità del soggetto che per la perfezione tecnica della foto, che manca completamente. l'occhio ti cade a destra? a me invece cade a sinistra, nonostante il diaframma fosse un discreto 6.3 la MAF è davvero poco profonda e a me pare concentrarsi sulle labbra (ovviamente puntavo ai denti) e sulla guancia a sinistra di chi guarda. |
| sent on October 11, 2012 (21:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
QUESTION! because at 1/2500 is blurred! DOMANDA! perchè a 1/2500 risulta mossa?! |
| sent on October 11, 2012 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
soccia that nonsense I wrote ... :-|
were the 800 ISO setting criticism I would have had to correct.
I'm at the point, the fire is not perfect may be due to a MAF is not optimal, but I do not understand the depth of field so low given the opening of 6.3 will not be the top but it is quite far from that of 2.8 or less usually uses specially those who want to reduce it. soccia, che baggianata che ho scritto... 
erano gli 800 iso l'impostazione critica che avrei dovuto correggere.
a sto punto, il fuoco non perfetto può essere dovuto solo ad una MAF non ottimale, però non mi spiego una profondità di campo così ridotta vista l'apertura di 6.3 che non sarà il top ma è comunque parecchio lontana dal 2.8 o meno che di solito utilizza chi vuole appositamente ridurla. |
| sent on October 22, 2023 (19:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful. Congratulations! Gianluigi Bellissima. Complimenti! Gianluigi |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
