What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 24, 2011 (21:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe it was better to put the pictures in the portraits ...
However, the composition would also have been good, but unfortunately the subject is underexposed.
You do not understand ... very sunglasses Forse era meglio mettere la foto nella sezione ritratti...
Comunque la composizione sarebbe anche stata buona, purtroppo però il soggetto è sottoesposto.
...non si capisce molto l'occhiale da sole |
| sent on August 25, 2011 (11:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comment.
The subject was deliberately underexposed. Looking at the photo from another monitor, which is not what I work with, I realized that the image loses a lot of brightness and color tones. I know how to give a tip!
“ „ Grazie del commento.
Il soggetto è stato volutamente sottoesposto. Guardando la foto da un altro monitor, che non è quello con cui lavoro, mi sono accorto che l'immagine perde molto di luminosità e toni dei colori. Mi sai dare una dritta?!
" " |
| sent on August 25, 2011 (12:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I see very dark.
I would not underexposed.
you have rightly used the flash, but you flatter front face ... and certainly not the black jacket helped you. io la vedo molto scura.
non avrei sottoesposto.
hai giustamente usato il flash, ma frontale ti ha appiattito il volto... e sicuramente la giacca nera non ti ha aiutato. |
| sent on August 29, 2011 (13:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thought it was a desired effect, and honestly I did not mind, it seems to me that the effect has been added to underexpose in post. What kind of exposure measurement you used, spots on the face?
However, I think the power of the flash and 'right,' cause otherwise you would have burned his face. If you wanted to have more detail on the jacket and the background had to raise the ISO, and adjust the flash output, so the natural light would have had a greater impact on the photo. Io credevo fosse un effetto voluto, e onestamente non mi dispiaceva, mi sembra che l'effetto di sottoesporre sia stato aggiunto in post. Che tipo di misurazione dell'esposizione hai usato, spot sul viso?
Comunque secondo me la potenza del flash e' giusta, perche' altrimenti avresti bruciato il viso. Se volevi avere maggiore dettaglio sulla giacca e sullo sfondo dovevi alzare gli ISO, e regolare di conseguenza la potenza del flash, in questo modo la luce naturale avrebbe avuto maggiore impatto sulla foto. |
| sent on September 21, 2011 (12:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Zanico, also would have illuminated the subject with the flash at the bottom side. Quoto Zanico, inoltre avrei illuminato il soggetto con dei flash a lato in basso. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
