RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Lost...

Mostre

View gallery (25 photos)



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (15:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I am sincerely selective desaturation, I believe it is something that is best buried in the past, it is difficult to use and I almost never find it effective or interesting.
I must admit that in this case it is not bad though and you've exploited something that I generally find ugly in an effective way even if I think it would work better if the lady was the only person present.
How is this logic-level choice?
for the rest there is a prospective deformation that I would correct, it's pretty simple and would enhance the aesthetic of the photo

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (15:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

who has chosen the color or that there is not only the lady? :-P
the color photo was ugly, it was very dark and tending to yellow because of the spotlights, the back complemenly in the shade. the only thing that looked like a jewel was the magnificent red lady's coat. I tried to make it black and white and worsened, so I thought of putting everything in black and white and just leaving her in color. in my opinion, he exclaimed that his gaze and his bodily position told me. it seems at the same time posing as part of the sculpture but its gaze is lost as if it did not really understand where it is, alienated.

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (15:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

ah, for prospective disorientation, I would not know how to work: - |
I've seen that there are various target corrections on PS but they fix more than anything like mild distortion or fisheye type stuff.
with falling lines I would know how to behave. the church had a raised floor, in practice the sculpture was on a higher level than where I was, and as far as I tried to hold the camera in bubble, I did not succeed :-(

avatarsupporter
sent on October 09, 2017 (16:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like this and also a lot, elegant this shot, one of the perfect light, sincere compliments :-)

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (17:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

for distortion you do it with all the photo editing programs, then it will slightly cut the image but there seems to be space ;-) However for me the main problem is the too many people present, removed the red one and the left one the other make the most confusing photo ... for desaturation ... I do not know how you got it but with photoshop masks you could try to leave just the jacket 8-) so it seems too out of context ... it's clearly an opinion personal :-D ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (17:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In fact, I thought I was just leaving the jacket, but I was left convinced by this that in the end is the first version I tried (after the B & W that I did not even save so much was worth it!) I have to try to see the result how come out!
Eh ... The other people I would have liked had not been there, but it was Sunday afternoon: - /

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

But do I make free transformation and then distort the image to a hand?
It's the only way I've found on my own but I'm a bit afraid of doing damage, such as altering the proportions or deforming things ...

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (17:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Which program do you use?

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (17:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

An interesting shot, good diagonal created by 3 people ;-)
The only thing I do not like is the woman's overlay on the left and right column.
David

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (18:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

@ales: photoshop. use is a word. let's say I try.
@baribal: Even the floor seems to me overexposed. I put the picture right to figure out how to behave in such a situation, dark everywhere and blinding lights.

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (18:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

if opening raw camera there should be automatic correction :-D
at least on lightroom there is just one click, then you can do it manually but it is more complex :-D .. consider that you will still have to crop a little photo ...
for exposure I can not tell you ...

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (18:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

even on PS there is automatic correction, enter machine (my no wobble) and goal but does not correct the crooked lines. I try on the raw room.

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (18:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I agree to 50% with the great labyrinth.

On one hand I agree that in this specific photo the solution of the selective restoration is not winning, on the other hand, I think it is a technique as difficult or as beautiful when it succeeds.

Time ago I did this photo

www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=2273592

Where the choice of selective restoration was necessary for me to convey a sense of solitude and indifference.

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (18:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I tried to shake it (maybe maybe it is V?) and "color" only the coat.
as you see another photo is released because I photshop-handicapped i took the other from jpeg and this from the raw. and I can not make it come the other one (although it has made cmq some small change also on the jpeg) the raw comes out loud, and with different colors I can not fix (I raised a coat in saturation and contrast and raw I miss the settings) ...
I have to improve even on this :-D
time at the time .. if i was good I was not here to massacre ahahah 8-)
ibb.co/mTKBQb

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (18:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

More to me :-D

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (18:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

to me ... you are Tuscan for strength!

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (19:25) | This comment has been translated

;-)

user72446
avatar
sent on October 09, 2017 (23:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the saturated red compared to the photo black and white .... Like shades and lights maybe a bit too high. The photo itself for the subjects I have taken does not send me much but is a personal opinion. I like developing instead.

avatarsenior
sent on October 10, 2017 (0:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The lights I know are burned: P
as I said, the place was completely immersed in the darkness, except those cursed spotlights illuminating the sculptures. the dark ones are saved, but the two white ones on the right have burned me.
but nobody explains how to solve the problem :-(
Should I find myself in such a situation I do?
spot measurement on lighter sculpture?
do I pay for a few stops less?
I was in priority time (set to 1/50 for not having too slow times, I always use this technique when I rush and have no time, rather than diaphragm priority where the machine instead sets me slow times when it is in light conditions poor) and according to the car was rightly exposed so%21

avatarsenior
sent on October 10, 2017 (0:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In short, I am not the person to answer you but I think that it agrees in these cases to underestimate and eventually recover afterwards, the shadows somehow recover the high lights if you burn no .....
Negative compensation can be the excellent solution also to expose in spot mode on high lights using lower iso then the shadows can recover you better ;-)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me