What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 05, 2017 (20:05)
Fairytale. |
| sent on October 05, 2017 (20:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi, I am the last of the last but I allow some comments: in my opinion you have failed the maf point, in the sense that the mountains appear sharp, but the stars are blurry.
Focusing (in theory it is infinite less peculiar. ..) should be made in manual, in live view, zooming in and framing a very bright star, after which it no longer touches the ring ring fire, unless you change the focus.
The diaphragm would leave it at maximum aperture, as time tests take place, it may happen that at 15 seconds of exposure the stars appear as segments.
There are so many ways for the post, and each one has its own, but the base is a shot (or more shots) perfectly focused.
Othersmore experienced than you will be of greater help.
greeting
Bruno Ciao, sono l'ultimo degli ultimi ma mi permetto alcune osservazioni: secondo me hai fallito il punto di maf, nel senso che le montagne appaiono nitidissime, ma le stelle sono sfocate.
La messa a fuoco ( in teoria essa è infinito meno qualchecosa. ..)andrebbe fatta in manuale, in live view, ingrandendo e inquadrando una stella molto luminosa, dopodichè non si tocca più la ghiera di messa a fuoco, a meno di non variare la focale.
Il diaframma lo lascerei alla massima apertura, per il tempo si fanno delle prove, può accadere che già a 15 secondi di esposizione le stelle appaiano come segmentini.
Per la post esistono tantissimi metodi e ognuno ha il suo, ma la base è partire da uno scatto ( o più scatti) perfettamente a fuoco.
Altri più esperti di me ti saranno di maggiore aiuto.
saluto
Bruno |
| sent on October 05, 2017 (21:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The composition I love, the colors are beautiful and the location is spectacular! I'm not a professional anyway, but I think it would be more effective with the stars in full focus (unless your intent was just to have the crisp mountains and the blurred sky!). La composizione mi piace molto, i colori sono bellissimi e la location è spettacolare! Non sono assolutamente una professionista, anzi, però secondo me sarebbe stata più efficace con le stelle completamente a fuoco (a meno che il tuo intento non fosse proprio quello di avere le montagne nitide e il cielo sfocato!). |
| sent on October 08, 2017 (18:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good morning guys, I was wrong to focus, I went ahead with editing and warming the sky the photo is much better and you notice much less Buongiorno ragazzi, si ho sbagliato a mettere a fuoco, sono andato avanti con l editing e riscaldando il cielo la foto é molto meglio e si nota molto meno |
| sent on October 09, 2017 (15:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful, but what time did you take it? was the night dark? Molto bella, ma a che ora l'hai scattata? era notte fonda? |
| sent on October 09, 2017 (15:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
was taken around midnight, but the milky way had sprung up earlier è stata scattata intorno alla mezzanotte, ma la via lattea era sorta tempo prima |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
