RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Pillars of Faith...

Architettura

View gallery (5 photos)

Pillars of Faith sent on October 04, 2012 (0:38) by Michele Bosco. 5 comments, 527 views.

1/3 f/2.8, ISO 160, hand held.




View High Resolution 8.8 MP  

1 person like it: Federico Bergamaschi


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user3824
avatar
sent on October 04, 2012 (13:05)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ciao! Scusa l'ignoranza. Dove hai scattato? La location è molto bella! Dal mio monitor (ma premetto che quello del PC da cui scrivo è più o meno una "sòla"MrGreen) mi pare che l'img sia un po' troppo contrastata. Me lo confermi o devo farmi sostituire lo schermo? (Con evidenti vantaggio per i miei occhi?Eeeek!!!)

Hello! Excuse the ignorance. Where was that taken? The location is very beautiful! From my monitor (but I state that one of the PC from which I write is more or less a "single":-D) I think that the img is a bit 'too contrasty. I confirm it me or do I replace the screen? (With obvious advantage for my eyes? Wow!)

avatarjunior
sent on October 04, 2012 (14:44)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


più che contrastata, mi pare che non ci sia definizione, o è mossa o sfocata, in fondo, verso l'altare poi credo che ci sia qualcosa che non vada.

rather than opposed, it seems to me that there is no definition, or moved or fuzzy, after all, to the altar, then I think there is something that should not be.

avatarsenior
sent on October 04, 2012 (15:39)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Il soffitto se è di lapislazzuli è un bel soffitto...
La foto... con 1.3sec di esposizione il mosso e tutti gli altri problemi sono inevitabili...
Marco

If the ceiling is of lapis lazuli is a beautiful ceiling ...
The photo ... with 1.3sec exposure blur and all other problems are inevitable ...
Mark

avatarjunior
sent on October 04, 2012 (17:34)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Ciao a tutti,
la foto è stata scattata nel Duomo di Alba (Cn).
Vista la ripresa a mano libera, il mosso è inevitabile.
Per il contrasto, da uno schermo all'altro ci ossono essere delle differenze.
La PP è stata quella classica( curve,livelli, ecc.)ma essendo alle prime armi è probabile che abbia ecceduto.
Le Vs domande servono proprio a capire dove stai andando.
Grazie!

Hello to all,
the photo was taken in the Cathedral of Alba (Cuneo).
Given the handheld shooting, the blur is inevitable.
To the contrary, from one display to another ossono there be a difference.
The PP was the classic (curves, levels, etc..) But being a beginner is likely to have exceeded.
Vs The questions are there to figure out where you're going.
Thank you!

avatarjunior
sent on October 05, 2012 (22:22)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


La butto li....secondo me la prossima volta faresti bene ad alzare gli iso . Esposizioni così lunghe richiedono una mano da Robocop
Poi , sempre secondo me , hai esagerato di brutto con la PP. Saturazione, Vividezza ,Neri e cmq troppo contrasto , sia con curve che con livelli trasformi la foto in un cartone animato o peggio ancora in un effetto "acquarello"....poi sono gusti:-P

I throw them .... I think the next time you'd do well to raise the ISO. Such long exposures require a helping hand from Robocop
Then, according to me, you've gone too bad with the PP. Saturation, Vibrance, Blacks and everyway too much contrast, with both curves with levels transform the photo into a cartoon or even worse in a "watercolor" .... then I taste:-P


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me