What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 25, 2017 (11:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wow! Gorgeous! :-D Wow! Bellissima! |
user1036 | sent on September 25, 2017 (15:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Of course, Andrea 1 "with the 70-200 in hand is so much stuff! You have exaggerated! The idea is good, but I would not be very happy with the outcome. The brides, for my tastes, remain too central and too moved. On the PP, I do not pronounce, they are tastes. Certo Andrea che 1" con il 70-200 in mano è tanta roba! Hai esagerato! Bella l'idea, ma io non sarei rimasto molto soddisfatto del risultato. Gli sposi, per i mie gusti rimangono troppo centrali e troppo mossi anche loro. Sulla PP, non mi pronuncio, sono gusti. |
| sent on September 25, 2017 (15:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photo is deliberately moved, otherwise I went to 1/4 and I would not have any problems ... then I may not like it but that is another wedding talk I enjoyed very much ex me counts only that ;-) La foto è volutamente mossa, altrimenti scattavo a 1/4 e non avrei avuto problemi... poi può non piacere ma quello è un altro discorso a sposi è piaciuta molto e x me conta solo quello ;-) |
| sent on September 25, 2017 (19:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To me the picture likes very much :-D I ask you 'ignorant': did you use the ND to increase the timing without getting so much light but ISO1250?!? I was thinking of an ISO100 ... ciaoo A me la foto piace tantissimo Ti chiedo da 'ignorante': hai usato l'ND per aumentare i tempi senza che entrasse tanta luce ma ISO1250?!? Pensavo un ISO100...ciaoo |
| sent on September 25, 2017 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If the spouses were left in motion, it would have been a super shot ... so ... to be honest and I do not want to, I just say my opinion, has little sense ... but experiencing is always a beautiful thing ... so good ... we have to try and try again ... Se gli sposi fossero rimasti immobili sarebbe stato uno scatto super... così... per essere sincero e non me lo volere, dico solo il mio parere, ha poco senso.... ma sperimentare è sempre una bellissima cosa... quindi bravo... dobbiamo provare e riprovare... |
| sent on September 25, 2017 (20:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all ... @ Unfortunately, I have a ND 12 stop filter and enough, in this case it served less, I wanted 2.8 that mixed with the move increased the detachment ... so 2.8 1 sec. + filter 12 stop those iso .... ;-) Grazie a tutti ... @Ilquare purtroppo ho un filtro ND 12 stop e basta, in questo caso serviva da meno, volevo 2,8 che mischiato al mosso aumentava lo stacco... quindi 2.8 1 sec. + filtro 12 stop quelli gli iso .... ;-) |
| sent on September 27, 2017 (1:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
While everything runs ..... including weddings !! Beautiful photo, anyway! Mentre tutto scorre ..... compresi i matrimoni!! Bella la foto, comunque! |
| sent on September 27, 2017 (8:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you too... Grazie anche a te... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |