What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 28, 2012 (18:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I might have opted for a vertical cut so take it as possibbile the tower but I also like so hello frank forse avrei optato per un taglio verticale in modo da prendere il piu possibbile la torre ma mi piace anche cosi ciao franco |
| sent on September 28, 2012 (19:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Frank, you're right, the vertical cut is better and I have just not convinced me the show, and catch up on some dark parts it turned out a bit of noise. I was undecided on what to post I put the link, hoping that you can see, if you tell me what you think a greeting Luca
 Ciao Franco, hai ragione il taglio verticale è meglio e ce l'ho solo che non mi convinceva l'esposizione, e per recuperare un po le parti scure è saltato fuori un po di rumore. Sono stato indeciso su quale postare Metto il link, sperando che si veda, se si dimmi cosa ne pensi un saluto Luca
 |
| sent on September 29, 2012 (0:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello I see that Luke has the alternatives, so the photos look better as a member by the vision of the most reliable place you deleted a portion of the buildings, but you gave magior risaltoalla tower that in this picture is the great part of it I have to say that I like congratulations Luca a free greeting ciao Luca vedo che ha le alternative,la foto cosi la vedo meglio come compo da piu la visione del posto certo hai eliminato un porzione di edifici ma hai dato magior risaltoalla torre che in quest immagine fa benissimo la sua parte si devo dire che mi piace complimenti Luca un saluto franco |
| sent on September 29, 2012 (0:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Franco Thanks for your opinion agree with you that in this case the vertical cut is clearly better, I had not posted due to non-perfect exposure in the lower part. Greetings Luca Grazie Franco per il tuo parere convengo con te che in questo caso il taglio verticale è nettamente migliore, non l'avevo postata a causa della non perfetta esposizione nella parte bassa. Un saluto Luca |
| sent on September 29, 2012 (1:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in my humble opinion underexposure at the bottom in case q and irrelevant cisarebbe took a double exp. which I unfortunately have not yet found the time to do ;-) :-( a mio modesto parere la sottoesposizione nella parte bassa in q caso e irrilevante cisarebbe voluta una doppia esposiz. cosa che io purtroppo non ho ancora trovato il tempo di fare  |
| sent on September 29, 2012 (5:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have several sequences made with the breketing exposure, waiting for one day learn to manage pp. Hopefully: fconfuso:. Greetings luca Ho diverse sequenze fatte con il breketing di esposizione, in attesa che un giorno impari a gestire in pp Speriamo . Un saluto luca |
| sent on October 04, 2012 (0:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like this, congratulations! Questa mi piace molto, complimenti! |
| sent on October 04, 2012 (1:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Roberto for your kind visit :-) Grazie mille Roberto per le gentili visite |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |