What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 12, 2017 (6:17) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (6:34) | This comment has been translated
Thanks. Mattiniero |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (7:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shot, compliments!
hello Claudio Bella ripresa, complimenti! ciao, Claudio |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (8:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately, the long distance 150-500 does not make it. I did various photos with different settings but nothing. I do not know where I'm wrong. This is the only shrewd I met. Purtroppo il 150-500 a lunga distanza non rende. Ho fatto varie foto con impostazioni diverse ma niente. Non so dove sbaglio. Questa è l'unica nitida che mi soddisfaceva. |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (8:26) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Claudio |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (11:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello places ... certainly with the low point of lying down, lying on the ground, it would be clearer. There had been a good light. ciao dioghi...certamente col punto di ripresa basso,sdraiato per terra, sarebbe venuta più nitida.se ci fosse stata una buona luce.saluti. |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (12:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I was in a wooden shed. The light was bad because sun and clouds alternated. Thanks for your advice. Ero in un capanno di legno. La luce era pessima perché si alternavano sole e nuvole. Grazie del consiglio. |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (12:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The 150-500 is used almost exclusively at f8 (this diaphragm returns the best results) and at a close distance ..... lowers the shooting point, uses camouflage techniques to bring subjects closer to you and respects the time Safety (for static subjects faster than 1/500, for fastest moving speeds of 1/1000 and for fastest ones of 1/1600 .... it can shoot at slower times but the number of shots Will be increased proportionally). Il 150-500 va utilizzato quasi esclusivamente ad f8(a questo diaframma restituisce i risultati migliori) e a distanza ravvicinata.....abbassa il punto di ripresa, utilizza le tecniche di mimetizzazione per far avvicinare a te i soggetti e rispetta il tempo di sicurezza(per i soggetti statici più veloce di 1/500, per quelli in movimento più veloce di 1/1000 e per quelli al volo più veloce di 1/1600....si può scattare con tempi più lenti ma il numero di scatti da cestinare aumenterà proporzionalmente). |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (12:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think I'm too much of my sigma. I miss the experience and the technique but I am self-taught and try again with the advice you give me. Thanks Luigi. I do not have much time to devote to this hobby. But I'm lucky to live in a place where fauna is not missing. I'm learning to recognize bird singing to find out what it is and where it comes from. Of course you should always have the reflex. Credo di pretendere troppo dal mio sigma. Mi manca l'esperienza e la tecnica ma da autodidatta provo e riprovo con i consigli che mi date. Grazie Luigi. Io non ho molto tempo da dedicare a questo hobby. Però ho la fortuna di vivere in un posto dove la fauna non manca. Sto imparando a riconoscere il canto degli uccelli per individuare di che specie si tratta e da dove proviene. Certo che bisognerebbe avere la reflex sempre dietro. |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (14:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I think I need too much of my sigma „
How do you understand :-P Nice click cmq " Credo di pretendere troppo dal mio sigma" come ti capisco bello scatto cmq |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (14:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But I can not afford to spend 5000 euros for a goal. I'll settle for mediocre photography. Però non posso permettermi di spendere 5000 euro per un obiettivo. Mi accontenterò di fare foto mediocri. |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (14:51) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Mauro |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (15:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The details are good, the pdr does not like and the subject seen so is a little too static, it does not send me much looking. In this kind of photography, however, it is often necessary to compromise. Or click and take the time or just look at it (which I unfortunately sometimes also have to reluctantly do). Good anyway as a photo I remember, and then if you are beginning with this look do not worry, she'll pretend something to you over time 8-) Greetings, Kevin I dettagli sono buoni, il pdr non mi piace e il soggetto visto così è un pochino troppo statico, non mi trasmette molto guardando. In questo genere di fotografia però bisogna spesso scendere a compromessi. O scatti e porti a casa il momento o ti limiti a guardare (cosa che purtroppo a volte ho dovuto fare a malincuore anche io). Buona in ogni caso come foto ricordo, e poi se sei all'inizio con quest'ottica non preoccuparti, sarà lei che pretenderà qualcosa da te col passare del tempo Saluti, Kevin |
| sent on August 12, 2017 (16:11) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Kevin. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |