What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user59947 | sent on August 09, 2017 (19:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice photo but shooting time has penalized you
bella foto ma il tempo di scatto ti ha penalizzato
|
| sent on August 09, 2017 (20:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Explain better Spiegati meglio |
user59947 | sent on August 09, 2017 (21:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In short, I thought that such a comment would have let you know :-)
Then i think you used f / 10 just to not burn the sun but the tree and all moved with lack of details. The sea seems to be the focus of the main object. that's all. insomma pensavo che un commento del genere lo avresti capito al volo
allora penso che hai usato f/10 solo per non brucciare il sole ma l'albero e tutto mosso con mancanza di dettagli. mi sembra più a fuoco il mare che l'oggetto principale. tutto qui. |
| sent on August 09, 2017 (21:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I used the one to have the sun to star and stay in cmq without trestle thanks x let me know. You have x tips for the prox Si ho usato quello per avere il sole a stella e starci dentro senza cavalletto cmq grazie x avermelo fatto notare. hai consigli x la prox |
user59947 | sent on August 09, 2017 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Look, in my opinion, the wrong focus seems to be using the auto focus and not the area or where you wanted it, maybe it confirms me. Otherwise the data will not be explained. Against the backdrop, the times rise even without increasing the iso
The big ones were to keep very low otherwise you burn all the whites, in fact the sky and everything burned :-)
Then for first reflex in M ??to have all overhead, iso 100, non-automatic focus but maybe central or zone. Then in a backlight so you could also go af / 13-f / 16 and with a minimum exposure of 1/2 stop. Then in pp you would regain the shadows
And shots data should be much higher than that guarda, secondo me in questo scatto ce la messa a fuoco sbagliato sembra usato la messa a fuoco automatica e non la zona o il punto dove volevi tu, magari me la confermi. altrimenti i dati cosi non si spiegano. sui controluci i tempi si alzano anche senza aumentare gli iso
gli iso erano da tenere bassissimi altrimenti ti brucci tutti i bianchi, infatti il cielo e tutto brucciato
allora per primo reflex in M PER AVERE TUTTO SOTTOCONTROLLO, iso 100 , messa a fuoco non automatica ma magari il centrale o a zona. poi in un controluce cosi potevi andare anche a f/13-f/16 e con esposimetro almeno di uno /2 stop in meno. poi in pp ricuperavi le ombre
e i dati di scatti dovrebero essere molto più alti di cosi
TI ALLEGO UNA MIA FOTO DI UN CONTROLUCE DIRRETTO E VEDI I DATI COME SONO
www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=210546&l=it#fot2265053
O PURE QUESTO
www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=192625&l=it#fot2382580 |
| sent on August 09, 2017 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If I did not remember I was in M ??I took exposure on the trunk without the solar rays then re-assembled with the sun rays with the same exposure Se nn ricordo male ero in M ho preso esposizione sul tronco senza i raggi solari poi ricomposto con i raggi solari con la stessa esposizione |
| sent on August 09, 2017 (23:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I wanted to emphasize your exposure where you would take it Volevo enfatizzare il fare tu esposizione dove l'avresti presa |
user59947 | sent on August 09, 2017 (23:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You had to expose the sky with 1/2 stop less then the rest recovered in pp and even the sun was much better. If you see the picture and too bright in everything, it does not even look like a backlight Dovevi esporrere il cielo con 1/2 stop in meno poi il resto si ricuperava in pp e anche il sole veniva molto meglio . Se tu vedi la foto e troppo luminosa in tutto, non sembra ne anche un controluce |
| sent on August 10, 2017 (0:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Okay, thank you for treating your advice Ok grazie faro' tesoro dei tuoi consigli |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
