JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on October 18, 2012 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And 'quite a bit' noisy, but if it's just the first you'll see that soon you'll get other better. Besides, with this type of photo no one on the first attempt produces picture perfect, nay, not even the second, third, etc. ... you have to take a little 'hand, and with the recovery that with the post.
hello
Clear E' un bel po' rumorosa, ma se è solo la prima vedrai che presto ne otterrai delle altre migliori. Del resto con questo tipo di foto nessuno al primo tentativo produce delle foto perfette, anzi, nemmeno al secondo, al terzo, etc...bisogna prenderci un po' la mano, sia con la ripresa che con la postproduzione.
sent on October 22, 2012 (17:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
PP damn, it's always a lot of work and also to repeat the same photo is never equal to the other. I wonder how do those who photograph the Milky Way in elapsed time and type 600 shots from 30 "f/2.8 ISO 3200 separated by 1 'each. I am two months that I'm developing my own photos with LR 4.2 and CS4 and I still do not like. Gianfranco, I think your photo is a crop of the bright part of the Milky Way, which program you used in PP? I would have done worse, sob :-|
Dannata PP, è sempre un lavoraccio e anche a ripeterla sulla stessa foto non è mai uguale alle altre. Chissà come fanno quelli che fotografano la Milky Way in elapsed time, tipo 600 scatti da 30" f/2.8 ISO 3200 intervallati da 1' ciascuna. Io sono due mesi che sto elaborando la mia stessa foto con LR 4.2 e CS4 e ancora non mi piace. Gianfranco, credo che la tua foto sia un crop della parte luminosa della Via Lattea, che programma hai usato in PP? Io avrei fatto peggio, sob
sent on November 23, 2012 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Beppe, not 'a crop, I framed the piece of sky in the sea with the 17/55 full-aperture 17 mm. and then 'worked was not me' but my brother in law (which is 'more' good) with ps cs6. hello and cordialitaaaaaaa. Free ciao Beppe, non e' un crop, ho inquadrato il pezzo di cielo in riva al mare con il 17/55 a tutta apertura 17 mm. poi e' stata lavorata non da me' ma da mio cognato (che e' piu' bravo)con ps cs6. ciao e cordialitaaaaaaa. Franco
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
17.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
