What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 24, 2012 (20:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Close af/18 is really excessive for a aps-c, in the version hd is a lack of definition of the image with loss of sharpness at the edges, accompanied by a dose of ac. Chiudere a f/18 è davvero eccessivo per una aps-c, nella versione hd si nota la mancanza di definizione dell'immagine con perdita di nitidezza ai bordi, accompagnata da una dose di ac. |
| sent on September 24, 2012 (21:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The landscape is very beautiful and the composition is also good apart from the soil in the bottom right, sharpness, however, the HD is really low and is even thinking of filtering noise quite loud, to correct even the ac.
Good shot but you have to revise the post ;-)
Hello. Il paesaggio è molto bello ed anche la compo è buona a parte il terreno nell'angolo basso destra, la nitidezza però nell'Hd è davvero bassa e fa anche pensare ad un filtraggio antirumore piuttosto forte, da correggere anche le ac.
Buono scatto ma devi rivedere la post
Ciao. |
| sent on September 24, 2012 (22:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You are right, I must confess my lack of dexterity with digital, slowly I'm learning new things and familiarity with the medium. I would be happy if giudicaste the last photo in my gallery .. Sharpness as you'd closed? Catherine, I also criticandomi dolcifichi the pill with compliments, I appreciate it.: (Which are the ac?) Fsorry: Avete ragione ,debbo confessare la mia scarsa manualità con il digitale ,piano piano sto apprendendo nuove cose e dimestichezza con il mezzo . Mi farebbe piacere se giudicaste le foto ultime nella mia galleria.. Sharpness a quanto avresti chiuso ? Caterina, anche criticandomi mi dolcifichi la pillola con dei complimenti ,te ne sono grato .: (che sono le ac? ) fsorry: |
| sent on September 24, 2012 (22:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yago Hello, I saw the pictures of the gallery. Those made with sigma are quite good. I think the problem is the low yield of 17-85, in addition to soffire strongly chromatic aberrations (ac) is very faint, especially at the edges. The ac is even in shots taken with the sigma. With aps-c sensors should not exceed f/11, f/13 at most because of diffraction. I think, as you suggested Catherine, you need to review the post-production (pp) in the shots. Hello ;-) Ciao Yago, ho visto le foto della galleria. Quelle fatte con il sigma sono abbastanza buone. Credo che il problema sia la scarsa resa del 17-85 che, oltre a soffire fortemente di aberrazioni cromatiche (ac) è davvero poco nitido, soprattutto ai bordi. L'ac c'è anche negli scatti eseguiti con il sigma. Con i sensori aps-c non si dovrebbe oltrepassare f/11, f/13 al massimo per via della diffrazione. Credo, come ti ha suggerito Caterina, che devi rivedere la post-produzione (pp) negli scatti. Ciao |
| sent on September 24, 2012 (22:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For ac responded Sharpness, now it's late, tomorrow I'll look to the last shots ;-)
Hello :-) Per le ac ha risposto Sharpness, adesso è tardi, domani do un'occhiata agli ultimi scatti
Ciao |
| sent on September 25, 2012 (18:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Your answers are correct and timely. I had planned to change the 17/85 with 15/85, the first I had a little 'too overstated, as actually attending the site I have learned a lot, now I have a better idea. I see from your gallery that you're a frequenter of those parts (blades of St. Martin) and you made it very well, I was enchanted. Thank you :-) Le tue risposte sono giuste e puntuali . Avevo in mente di cambiare il 17/85 con il 15/85 ,il primo lo avevo un po' troppo sopravalutato,effettivamente man mano frequentando il sito ho imparato molte cose ,ora ho le idee più chiare. Vedo dalla tua galleria che sei un frequentatore di quelle parti (pale di S. Martino ) e le hai rese molto bene ,io sono rimasto incantato . Grazie |
| sent on October 31, 2012 (22:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice the colors, the composition, the reflection and the point of recovery. I reduced to F.13 the diaphragm to remove the appearance of diffraction and adjusted the angle on the left. hello and good light, laurel Piacevoli le cromie, la composizione, il riflesso e il punto di ripresa. Avrei ridotto a f.13 il diaframma per allontanare l'insorgere della diffrazione e aggiustata l'inclinazione a sinistra. ciao e buona luce, lauro |
| sent on November 01, 2012 (19:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Totally agree. ;-) Perfettamente d'accordo . |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
