What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user1036 | sent on July 06, 2017 (16:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations on the handling of the lights but above all of the pose, natural with a penetrating look. Gorgeous!!! Complimenti per la gestione delle alter luci ma soprattutto della posa, naturale con sguardo penetrante. Bellissima!!! |
| sent on July 06, 2017 (16:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ahahaah glow .... ps high lights? I have a D5 what is the problem? If I had a canon maybe I would have had a problem, I did not even use a light so bright for .... ;-) ahahaah glisso .... ps alte luci? ho una D5 qual'è il problema? se avessi avuto canon magari avrei avuto un problema, non ho usato neanche una luce di schiarita tanto per ....  |
user1036 | sent on July 06, 2017 (16:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
... ah I forgot you were Nikon employee :-D
Beautiful photo ... nice also the fountain, indeed er fountain! ;-)
Good light
PS
... since when in Canon here we have problems with high lights ???? We expose to dx .... which for us means overexposure 8-) ergo ...ah dimenticavo che eri Nikon dipendente 
bella foto...bella pure la fontana, anzi er fontanone!
buona luce
PS
...da quando in qua in Canon abbiamo problemi con le alte luci???? Esponiamo a dx....che per noi vuol dire sovraesporre  ergo |
| sent on July 06, 2017 (17:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
When you realize that exposing to the right is always related to the scene and it is not the panacea for everything it will be too late ahahaha if i have high lights to preserve in a scene with a great range, how far will i be able to push it right? 11:00 am beautiful light? .... the beautiful light one has to find it, at all times there is a beautiful light, just know what to do ... and no flash or panels ;-) Good Light Quando capirete che esporre a destra è sempre relativo alla scena e non è la panacea per tutto sarà troppo tardi ahahaha se ho delle alte luci da preservare in una scena con un grande gamma, quanto a destra mi potrò spingere? Ore 11:00 bella luce?.... la bella luce uno la deve trovare, a tutte le ore c'è una bella luce, basta sapere cosa fare... e non servono flash o pannelli ;-) Buona Luce |
user119620 | sent on July 06, 2017 (17:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Illuminating conversation! Superb picture ... every bride would like to have it! :-) Conversazione illuminante! Foto superba...ogni sposa vorrebbe averla! |
| sent on July 06, 2017 (20:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful photo beautiful bride and beautiful black and white.
Compliments Bella la foto bella la sposa e bello il bianco e nero .
Complimenti |
| sent on July 06, 2017 (22:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fantastic Andrea ... no words! Beautifully the white you got, and not least the pose and the dress of the bride!
... this means that you were already ready to frame the bride "in (almost) every movement!
A greeting Stefano. Fantastica Andrea...senza parole! Bellissimo il bianco che hai ottenuto, e non da meno la posa e il vestito della sposa!
...questo vuol dire che eri già pronto ad inquadrare la sposa "in (quasi) ogni suo movimento!
Un saluto Stefano. |
user1036 | sent on July 06, 2017 (22:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
"And do not use flash or panels" C
Aro Blade, it serves what you can use and realize the photo you have in mind. " e non servono flash o pannelli " C
aro Blade, serve ciò che sei in grado di usare e realizzare la foto che hai in mente. |
user1036 | sent on July 06, 2017 (22:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Exposing to dx, I know I have to go in the street before I understand, but this photo illuminates me immensely and clears the ideas ... even without the use of flash ... scherzo blade Sull'esporre a dx, mi sa che ne devo fare di strada prima di capire, ma questa foto mi illumina d'immenso e schiarisce le idee...anche senza l'uso di flash...scherzo blade |
| sent on July 07, 2017 (10:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to everyone .... the exposure to the right is not difficult, you just have to know your sensor well to the various iso and understand when you can apply it ... but if you want to preserve a sky rather than talk about exposure to DX I would say to expose to the limit of sky clipping, then recover lights and shots on the shadows, but this does not coincide with an exposure to the right, you will see that the photo often continues to be under undiscovered histogram .... ;-) Grazie a tutti.... l'esposizione a destra non è difficile, devi solo conoscere bene il tuo sensore ai vari iso e capire quando la puoi applicare ... ma se ad esempio vuoi preservare un cielo,più che parlare di esposizione a DX io direi di esporre al limite del clipping del cielo, poi recuperi luci e tiri su le ombre, questo però non coincide con un esposizione a destra, vedrai che spesso la foto continua ad essere da istogramma sottoesposta.... ;-) |
user1036 | sent on July 07, 2017 (11:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Of course, also because there is much more information, in terms of bits, in an over-exposed (non-burnt) image, than in an undefined image. The term espx to dx is a much wider conciliation simplification, which goes through the knowledge of its capture and development tools. Maybe some photo I know too ;-) Certo, anche perché ci sono molte più informazioni , in termini di bit, in una immagine sovraesposta (non bruciata), che in una immagine sottoesposta. Il termine esponi a dx è una semplificazione di in concerto ben più ampio, che passa attraverso la conoscenza dei propri strumenti di cattura e di sviluppo. Forse qualcosina di fotografia la so anche io ;-) |
user1036 | sent on July 07, 2017 (13:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is a very broad range without peaks, however it tends to dx. Then to overcome these things comes out the strobist in me who controls the light instead of being commanded. È una gamma molto estesa senza picchi, comunque tende a dx. Poi per ovviare a queste cose esce fuori lo strobista che c'è in me che comanda la luce invece di essere comandato. |
user1036 | sent on July 07, 2017 (13:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Anyway this is nice Comunque bella anche questa |
| sent on July 07, 2017 (13:40) | This comment has been translated
Excellent catch! |
| sent on July 07, 2017 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Dynamic photo flash has two limits, someone needs someone close to the subject that keeps it often, so it needs another person and this is not always possible for a thousand reasons, and you lose time in a job that often does not have time, I was 120 Mm 1/1000 f / 4.0, with that light if I used a flash on the machine it was supposed to be a x can lighten ahahah if you have the flash time ok! Otherwise it is best to avoid it ... Il flash in foto dinamiche ha due limiti, serve qualcuno vicino al soggetto che lo tiene spesso, quindi serve un altra persona e questo non sempre è possibile x mille motivi, e si perde tempo in un lavoro spesso che non ha tempo, stavo a 120 mm 1/1000 f/4.0, con quella luce se usavo un flash sulla macchina doveva essere un cannone x schiarire ahahah se hai tempo il flash ok! altrimenti è meglio evitarlo ... |
| sent on July 07, 2017 (13:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, that's all ... but the D5 allows too much ..!
Those who do not know us do not know .... They're really beautiful, Blade compliments.
Si, vero tutto... ma anche la D5 permette tanto..!
Chi non ce la non lo sa.... Veramente belle entrambi, complimenti Blade.
|
| sent on July 07, 2017 (14:01) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Giorgio |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
