JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on July 04, 2017 (10:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marcolì .... if I can afford it: - Closely closed diaphragm was understood by the "stellate" light points ... maybe xò is a bit too closed ... consider that after f11 already with your car ("ours" ;-)) the diffraction begins to emerge On the image so you do not have a corresponding increase in sharpness; - The photo has a lot of noise to be an ISO 100 ... and even horizontal banding (but you did ... a 5d3 ?? :-D .... now fanboy's come and stoner me alive !!!! !!!!! :-() ... or it's thermal noise (but for that CMOS for only 13 "I doubt it) or you're exaggerated to open the shadows and overexposed; - In general, lack of clarity and / or acuity: or there are diffraction problems as I said before (but I do not believe in this case), or haveA bit fucked (more likely !!).
My2cents. :-D Marcolì....se posso permettermi: - Il diaframma (abbastanza) chiuso si capiva dai punti luce "stellati"...forse xò è un pò troppo chiuso...considera che dopo f11 già con la macchina tua ("nostra") la diffrazione comincia a evidenziarsi sull'immagine e quindi non hai un corrispondente aumento di nitidezza; - La foto presenta parecchio rumore per essere un ISO 100...e anche banding orizzontale (ma che ti sei fatto...una 5d3?? ....ora arrivano i fanboy e mi lapidano vivo!!!!!!!!!) ...o è rumore termico (ma per quel CMOS per soli 13" ne dubito) o hai esagerato ad aprire le ombre e a sovraesporre; - In generale manca nitidezza e/o acutanza: o ci sono problemi di diffrazione come ti ho detto prima (ma non credo in questo caso), oppure hai un pò cannato il fuoco (più probabile!!).
sent on July 04, 2017 (12:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Edit: I've read wrong; F8 as the diaphragm is ok (I mistakenly read f13 !!). The diaphragm is ok .... the noise problem (with banding) and, at this point, the out of focus (which could also be a b / f focus of the lens that would be "microregulated" / calibrated) remains. Edit: ho letto male; f8 come diaframma è ok (avevo erroneamente letto f13!!). Il diaframma è ok....resta il problema del rumore (con accenno di banding) e, a questo punto, del fuori fuoco (che potrebbe anche essere un b/f focus della lente che andrebbe "microregolata"/tarata!)
sent on July 04, 2017 (13:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I understand mo the gate :-) :-) :-) :-) :-). Let's say I opened enough shadows. The original file is almost practically black :-P. I must see that the microregulation of the lens is :-P however calculating that I focused on hand I might be wrong Ho capito mo la cancello . Diciamo che ho aperto abbastanza le ombre. il file originale è quasi praticamente nero . Devo vede sta microregolazione della lente però calcolando che ho focheggiato a mano potrei essermi sbagliato
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
) 
) la diffrazione comincia a evidenziarsi sull'immagine e quindi non hai un corrispondente aumento di nitidezza; 
) ...o è rumore termico (ma per quel CMOS per soli 13" ne dubito) o hai esagerato ad aprire le ombre e a sovraesporre; 
. 
