What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 01, 2017 (15:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm curious to see the shot before pp. Evaluating it is like firing on the red cross. Sin. Mi incuriosisce vedere lo scatto prima della pp. Valutarla cosi è come sparare sulla croce rossa. Peccato. |
| sent on July 01, 2017 (17:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Why do you make the permalous? I appreciate your shots and I have not listed the things that do not go because I'm sure you know what they are but if you want me to do it. This habit of going to look at the galleries of those who are critical and then responding to attack is just childish, but you are not alone, do not worry. Perché fai il permaloso? Io apprezzo i tuoi scatti e non ho elencato apposta le cose che secondo me non vanno perché sono certo che tu sai quali siano, ma se vuoi lo faccio. Questa abitudine di andare a guardare nelle gallerie di chi muove una critichina e poi rispondere attaccando è proprio infantile, ma non sei il solo, non preoccuparti. |
| sent on July 01, 2017 (17:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then I go with constructive criticism, as Juza's user I say I can afford it.
You've made a PP image probably a good mess in a mess, with a confused blur of dx in the figure and a plasticine embedded in the abdomen, and not only that, in addition, the foot can not go unnoticed. I just say that it does not even look like your picture, since you've become accustomed to much more curious things. Allora vado con le critiche costruttive, visto che come utente di Juza io dico che me lo posso permettere.
Hai reso in PP un'immagine probabilmente ben fatta in un pasticcio, con uno sfuocato confuso a dx della figura e un incarnato plasticoso sull'addome e non solo, in più i/il piede non può passare inosservato. Dico solo che non sembra neanche una tua foto, visto che ci hai abituato a cose molto più curate. |
| sent on July 02, 2017 (11:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It would also be interesting to understand what you are talking about since you've removed the post of criticism received! Sarebbe anche interessante capire di cosa si parla, visto che hai tolto i post delle critiche ricevute! |
| sent on July 02, 2017 (11:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ It would also be interesting to understand what you are talking about since you've removed the post of criticism received! „
I did not take anything away. You may have the user blocked Paphoto or he has blocked you and you do not see his messages " Sarebbe anche interessante capire di cosa si parla, visto che hai tolto i post delle critiche ricevute! "
Io non ho tolto assolutamente nulla. Forse hai l'utente Paphoto bloccato o lui ha bloccato te e non ti compaiono i suoi messaggi |
| sent on July 02, 2017 (22:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi, odd. I did not lock anyone and I was not blocked!
Anyway, it's not so essential, just that I did not understand. Boh, strano. Non ho bloccato nessuno e nemmeno sono stato bloccato!
Ad ogni modo non è così essenziale, solo che non capivo. |
| sent on July 02, 2017 (23:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Obviously he blocked you Evidentemente ti ha bloccato lui |
| sent on July 02, 2017 (23:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry Dario, I say I like the series, sensual and not vulgar.
But this and that with similar cut in BN .. what effect did you use? You posterized?
Many of your photos have to see them from pcs that shoot my reds in the stars from the cell .. scusa Dario, premetto che mi piace la serie, sensuale e non volgare.
ma questa e quella col taglio simile in BN.. che effetto hai usato? hai posterizzato?
molte delle tue foto devo vederle da pc che dal cell mi sparano i rossi alle stelle.. |
| sent on July 02, 2017 (23:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No, I did not postpone No non ho posterizzato |
| sent on July 03, 2017 (11:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Lights burned a little everywhere, artifacts, light-shade transitions at "steps", a blur in pp "posticcia" luci bruciate un po ovunque, artefatti, transizioni luce-ombra a "scalini", una sfocatura in pp "posticcia" |
user12372 | sent on July 03, 2017 (16:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well ... the right foot has something ... odd Beh...il piede destro ha qualcosina...di strano |
| sent on July 03, 2017 (18:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's the position, the foot is not remodeled at all.
The lights are deliberately fired in that way E' la posizione, il piede non è ritoccato minimamente.
Le luci sono volutamente sparate in quel modo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
