RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Portrait and Fashion
  4. » I'll hop 2017

 
I'll hop 2017...

ritratti3

View gallery (21 photos)

I'll hop 2017 sent on June 21, 2017 (9:02) by Raffaella Iossa. 11 comments, 256 views.

at 87mm, 1/125 f/2.8, ISO 100, hand held.




View High Resolution 2.8 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on June 21, 2017 (13:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

bell'esperssione. I would have liked to see the eye on fire to figure out what he lost or gained

avatarsenior
sent on June 21, 2017 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks, I too would like to see both eyes in focus, I do a lot of effort !!

avatarsenior
sent on June 21, 2017 (21:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

"I do a lot of work !!" . Sorry but why did you use f2.8: you've already seen it in your wonderful portraits with the sigma 105 which at these distances work well 4-5 diaphragms.

(I'm just trying to learn, sooner or later some donzella the catch :-D)

avatarsenior
sent on June 22, 2017 (8:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Is that I like to work on very large openings ...;)

avatarsenior
sent on June 23, 2017 (15:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Leave room for thought ... how to glimpse the thigh of a beautiful woman .. :-D

But then better not to deepen .. or risks .. hi hi :-D

But life is a risk.

avatarsenior
sent on June 26, 2017 (12:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I did the tests .. theoretically it was feasible the 2.8 on this portrait, I speak as a rendering of sharpness and bokeh,
The DOF at 1.5 meters is about 3 cm. If you focus your eye, your nose tip is already blurry,
Too bad that your AF lens has AF accuracy, it has caught about 3 cm

avatarsenior
sent on June 26, 2017 (14:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Naturman, of what you told me I did not understand anything !! I will have to explain it well, also know if the lens is possible microregulation ..... uffa !!!

avatarsenior
sent on June 26, 2017 (20:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Put a ruler at 45 degrees and point the autofocus in one at a precise point and go to see what matches what you see with what you then go to find in photography

avatarsenior
sent on June 26, 2017 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ok I did the test of the batteries, it seems accurate .. I will do that bumped;)

avatarsenior
sent on June 26, 2017 (21:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sincerely the lens seems to have discrete reviews and for the portraits it looks good, but shooting at 200mm without stabilizer, if autofocus is slow, I think there may be problems, it's a shame because it has a good price

Good light .. hello

avatarsenior
sent on June 26, 2017 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Next time I will try keeping the diaphragm slightly more closed, thank you !! Good light and little wind to you;)




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me