Miramare Castle | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

Resize to fit window

paesaggi View gallery (21 photos)

Miramare Castle sent on September 18, 2012 (21:02) by Walter Serafini. 4 comments, 1417 views.

, 1/2000 f/4.5, ISO 100, Trieste, Italy.

6 persons like it: Jacopo94, Jamesdouglasmorrison, Massimo P, Maxt, Roberto Onano, Yaghoobi

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Franzkekko

sent on September 18, 2012 (21:29)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

peccato per la qualità...La composizione è molto piacevole. Forse causa della compressione, forse causa del diaframma troppo aperto. Perchè hai usato l'apertura massima e hai scattato a 1/2000s? Con obiettivi di qualità non eccelsa sarebbe l'ideale chiudere di almeno 2 o 3 stop quindi se il massimo è f/4.5 chiudere a f/5.6 o f/6.3.
Francesco

shame about the quality ... The composition is very nice. Perhaps due to compression, perhaps due to the iris open too. Why did you use the maximum aperture and you took to 1/2000s? With the objective of not excellent quality would be ideal close at least 2 or 3 stop so if the maximum is close to f/5.6 f/4.5 of/6.3.
Francis

Beppeverge

sent on September 18, 2012 (22:35)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Giusto il suggerimento di Franzkekko, aggiungo che quel pezzetto di muro in basso a dx non ci sarebbe dovuto essere.
In ogni caso è una foto piacevole e composta con gusto.
ciao

Just the suggestion of Franzkekko add that that little piece of wall at the bottom right there should have been.
In any case it is a photo pleasant and composed with taste.
hello

Walter Serafini

sent on September 18, 2012 (22:38)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Non mi ero accorto sul momento del diaframma aperto perchè non vedevo le informazioni della fotocamera Triste

Comunque grazie del tuo commento Ciao ;-)

I did not realize at the time of the diaphragm open because I did not see the information of the camera :-(
Anyway thanks for your comment Hello ;-)

Walter Serafini

sent on September 18, 2012 (22:41)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Grazie , come detto prima facevo molta fatica ad inquadrare per via del sole, ciao Beppeverge ;-)

Thank you, as I said before was hard to frame because of the sun, hello Beppeverge ;-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.