What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 06, 2017 (18:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The composition, avoiding the classic reflection, could make sense if the grass did not overlap the rest, so grass (even blurred, why not?), Lake, meadow, mountains, sky. So it is very confusing. And since you put the version up, I suggest you look at it, there are a lot of nasty artifacts on the edges in the sky in all the clearer areas. ;-) La composizione, evitando il classico riflesso, poteva avere un senso se l'erba non si fosse sovrapposta al resto, quindi erba (anche sfuocata, perchè no?), lago, prato, monti ,cielo. Così è molto confusionaria. E visto che hai messo la versione in alta, ti consiglio di darci una occhiata, ci sono un sacco di brutti artefatti sui bordi, nel cielo, in tutte le zone più chiare. |
| sent on June 07, 2017 (20:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The strength of this photo is given by those bushes that are part of the image to partially hide. There are some artifacts in the bright areas but there is little notice, rather I find the hue of the clouds too hot. Still, the picture is really beautiful and the post-production is great. La forza di questa foto è data proprio da quei ciuffi d'erba che vanno a celare parzialmente buona parte dell'immagine. Un po' di artefatti nelle zone luminose ci sono ma si notano pochissimo, piuttosto trovo eccessivamente calda la tonalità delle nuvole. La foto comunque è veramente molto bella ed è ottima la post-produzione. |
| sent on June 08, 2017 (8:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@lafit A "good postproduction" for me is one that does not show artifacts. If you know them very little, it is because you do not want to see them. 8-) @lafit Una "ottima postproduzione" per me è quella che non mostra artefatti. Se tu li noti pochissimo, è perchè non li vuoi vedere. |
| sent on June 08, 2017 (19:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion, the clumps of grass make the difference in this photo. I like them very much. Unfortunately I can not say the same to this general run to use the effect of Orton. Ok, it's been fashionable lately, but I know that almost everyone is using it now, and the original originality is lost. Then, in this specific case maybe it was applied with too much emphasis, making the scene almost "fantasy". Personal opinion. secondo me i ciuffi d'erba fanno la differenza in questa foto. mi piacciono molto. purtroppo non posso dire lo stesso per questa rincorsa generale ad usare l'effetto di Orton. ok, va molto di moda ultimamente, ma noto che ormai lo usano quasi tutti, e l'originalita' iniziale si e' persa. poi, in questa caso specifico forse e' stato applicato con troppa enfasi rendendo la scena quasi "fantasy". parere personale. |
| sent on September 01, 2017 (13:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Composition 9, post 5.5 :) Composizione 9, post 5.5 :) |
| sent on September 01, 2017 (13:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Composition 9, post 5.5 :) Composizione 9, post 5.5 :) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
27.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
