What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 02, 2017 (16:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you are right hai ragione |
| sent on June 02, 2017 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful wall of stars, a bit hard to think that we are alone :-) compliments Bel muro di stelle, un po' dura pensare che siamo soli complimenti |
| sent on June 03, 2017 (8:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great Angel :-D Grande Angelo |
| sent on June 03, 2017 (10:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had seen it on facebook..there is another thing ... even more spectacular .. L'avevo vista su facebook..qui è tutta un'altra cosa...ancora più spettacolare.. |
| sent on June 03, 2017 (11:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the comments :-D in this photo I used the sig no 70-200 not os hsm lent by my af / 4 friend :) I noticed that with this resonance technique at different iso the dynamic range exponentially increases And post-production work decreases ... If you can suggest a good goal that will open at 300mm. I had thought about sigma 120-300mm 8-) Grazie a tutti per i commenti in questa foto ho usato il sigma 70-200 non os hsm prestato da un mio amico a f/4 :) ho notato che con questa tecnica di ripresa a diversi iso la gamma dinamica aumenta in modo esponenziale e il lavoro in post produzione diminuisce... Se magari potete consigliarmi un buon obiettivo che a tutta apertura che arrivi a 300mm. Io avevo pensato al sigma 120-300mm |
| sent on June 08, 2017 (19:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bravo Angelo! Bravo Angelo! |
user44198 | sent on June 08, 2017 (22:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good angel, you know how I think it ... for me you only have that option that we discussed .... For this high resolution image, I know this is not the ultimate goal for astrophysics, it has disrupted the stars in concert with some action used to remove some noise produced by the sensor, what you could do to try to diminish a little ' Stellar "elongation" effect, diaphragming at 5,6 or even 7,00 by removing the geometric imperfection typical of objectives too open as the one used. It is clear that these are suggestions made by the personal experience made available to improve the final results ;-) ;-) bravo Angelo,tu sai come la penso...per me ti rimane solo quell'opzione di cui abbiamo discusso.... per questa immagine a grande risoluzione noto che questo obiettivo non è il massimo per le astrofotografia,ha deturpato le stelle di concerto con qualche azione usata per togliere un pò di noise prodotto dal sensore,quello che potresti fare per cercare di diminuire un pò l'effetto "allungamento" stellare,diaframmando a 5,6 o anche 7,00 togliendo difatto quell'imperfezione geometrica tipica di obiettivi troppo aperti come quello usato. sia ben chiaro che questi sono suggerimenti dettati dall'esperienza personale messa a disposizione per far migliorare i risultati finali  |
| sent on June 13, 2017 (16:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Certainly Riccardo :) I'm racking up money to take the Takahashi FS 60CB :) Certo Riccardo :) Sto racimolando soldi per prendere il Takahashi FS 60CB :) |
| sent on June 13, 2017 (16:11) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Beppe  |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |