What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 30, 2017 (22:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It was a good photo.
Before post production.
Post exaggerated, illogical, and malicious, so that parts of the true skin of the model have remained despite the attempt to turn it into a plastic doll.
Replayed by the original shots and apply a VERY less invasive and damaging post.
Era una buona foto.
Prima della post produzione.
Post esagerata, illogica, e malfatta, tanto che parti della vera pelle della modella sono rimaste nonostante il tentativo di trasformarla in una bambola di plastica.
Riparti dallo scatto originale e applica una post MOLTO meno invasiva e deleteria.
|
| sent on May 31, 2017 (0:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fortunately, there are people like you who think of photography and postproduction, and never loses opportunity to dispel wisdom! Per fortuna che c'è gente come te che se ne intende di fotografia e postpodruzione, e che non perde mai occasione per dispensare saggezza! |
| sent on May 31, 2017 (8:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Remarkable model and nice picture. I do not want to give up wisdom, but actually the retouch is not the best. Around the calf lace and close to the thong, the skin imperfections remained so that they would not be so much emphasized on the most homogenous original shot. Looking at the miniature photo is a good photo, but opening the image the defects are seen too much. It is not a lesson but an objective observation Modella notevole e foto piacevole. Non voglio dispensare saggezza , ma effettivamente il ritocco non e' il massimo. Intorno al laccio del reggicalze ed in prossimità del perizoma sono rimaste le imperfezioni della pelle che non sarebbero risaltate così tanto sullo scatto originale sicuramente più omogeneo. Guardando la foto in miniatura risulta una buona foto , ma aprendo L immagine i difetti si vedono troppo. Non e' una lezione ma una constatazione oggettiva |
| sent on May 31, 2017 (12:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fischer, of your comment (and his tone) obviously I mean and you do not.
Besides, just read what you write: comment my comment instead of expressing something on the click.
Have some balls and write something meaningful, from tips, criticism, do something useful. Fischer, dal tuo commento (e dal suo tono) evidentemente io me ne intendo e tu no.
Del resto, basta leggere quello che scrivi: commenti il mio commento anzichè esprimere qualcosa sullo scatto.
Abbi un po' di palle e scrivi qualcosa di significativo, dai consigli, critica, fai qualcosa di utile. |
| sent on June 01, 2017 (0:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not answer in a tone because it is clear that it is not worth it, I have several useful things to do all day rather than waste time answering certain Napalms; It was a lot that I did not post a picture, it will definitely go so far for the next, especially in this section of pornography genes Non rispondo a tono perchè è chiaro che non ne vale la pena, io ho parecchie cose utili da fare tutto il giorno piuttosto che perdere tempo a rispondere a certi Napalm51; era molto che non postavo una foto, decisamente ne passerà ancora tanto per la prossima, soprattutto in questa sezione di geni pornografi |
| sent on June 01, 2017 (1:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Alvar's criticism can only be shared, perhaps I would have done it with different tones, but I do not understand why, especially in this section, criticisms are never accepted.
Greetings, Angel La critica di Alvar non può che essere condivisa, magari l'avrei fatta con toni diversi, però non capisco perché, soprattutto in questa sezione, le critiche non vengano mai accettate.
Saluti, Angelo |
| sent on June 01, 2017 (10:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know what makeup you did but I would not have touched it. Anyway, I like your posts. Hi Antonio ;-) Non so quali ritocchi tu abbia fatto ma io non l'avrei toccata. Comunque mi piacciono i tuoi post. Ciao Antonio  |
| sent on June 01, 2017 (13:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
True comments do not like it, because in most cases unavoidable stunts are inevitable.
But there are so many phenomena, and when it is pointed out to him that phenomena are not, clearly indicating the motives, they also piss off as whimsical children.
I miss time to give directions to improve. I commenti veritieri non piacciono perchè nella maggior parte dei casi sono inevitabili stroncature.
Ma qui tanti si credono fenomeni, e quando gli viene fatto notare che fenomeni non sono, indicandogli chiaramente i motivi, si incazzano pure come bambini capricciosi.
Perdo tempo a dare indicazioni per migliorare. |
| sent on June 02, 2017 (17:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fischer, I'm a pivello, but I recommend you to leave the raw .. the photo deserves, maybe I would have models like this, but you can not deny that you've got too soft and badly, maybe you were in a hurry. It happens .. They are not big mistakes, they are easily corrected Fischer, io sono un pivello, però ti consiglio di ripartire dal raw.. la foto merita sicuramente , magari io avessi modelle così, ma non puoi negare che hai lisciato troppo e malamente, forse avevi fretta. Capita.. Non sono errori grossi, sono facilmente correggibili |
| sent on June 02, 2017 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would also try only with Nik filters
Select skin color and he only softens the one .. Io proverei anche solo con i filtri della Nik
Selezioni il colore della pelle e lui ammorbidisce solo quello .. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
