JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on May 04, 2017 (9:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Generally, the photo should not be supported by the title, but in this case, thanks to it, it can be nice. That said my advice is to consider snap data before the fatal click, in this case use a 50mm and you have as time 1/8000 and a sensitivity equal to Iso 1000. I would personally drop with the sensitivity value at the expense of Time and already that there was a little more closure of the diaphragm so you also gain some pdc that never breaks. You would still have safety margin to counteract any microregion. Generalmente la foto non dovrebbe essere sostenuta dal titolo, ma in questo caso proprio grazie ad esso riesce ad essere simpatica. Detto questo il mio consiglio è quello di considerare i dati di scatto prima del fatidico clic, in questo caso usi un 50mm ed hai come tempo 1/8000 ed una sensibilità pari a Iso 1000. Personalmente sarei sceso con il valore di sensibilità a scapito del tempo e già che c'eri chiudere un po' di più il diaframma così da guadagnare anche un po' di pdc che non guasta mai. Avresti avuto ancora margine di sicurezza per controbattere un eventuale micromosso.
sent on May 04, 2017 (9:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello pigi, absolutely in tune with your thoughts. is flawless. In my favor there is only a photo taken in a hurry and fury since the baby was very fast and the car was in the house while the lamp was outside.this, as you say, is more like a cheeky look than sought after, definitely! Thanks for the passage and compliments instead to you with your wonderful shots. Hello! ciao pigi , assolutamente in sintonia con il tuo pensiero. non fa una piega. a mio favore c'è solo una foto fatta in fretta e furia dato che il piccolo era molto veloce e la macchina era in casa mentre la lampada è all'esterno.detto questo , come dici tu, è più uno scatto simpatico che ricercato , sicuramente! grazie del passaggio e complimenti invece a te con i tuoi meravigliosi scatti. ciao!
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
