What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 23, 2017 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I shot with 100mm paralleo to 135mm, 100mm on the 60D I put CentralDS 1600 iso cooled to -19 ° f / 5.6, 135mm on the 60D modified with UV filter IR-Cut Astrodon, uncooled, 800 ISO at f / 4 ... so I realized similar times and have driven together with the Lacerta MGEN II both sequences. What you notice is that the 60D ISO 800 to 1600 ISO is a real noise jump, you can use it to 800 iso cooled perhaps might be the optimal solution. In any case it seems to me that the test is positive. Ho scattato con il 100mm in paralleo al 135mm, sul 100mm ho messo la 60D CentralDS a 1600 iso raffreddata a -19° e a f/5.6, sul 135mm la 60D modificata con filtro UV-IR Cut Astrodon, non raffreddata, a 800 iso e a f/4 ...così ho realizzato tempi simili ed ho pilotato insieme con la Lacerta MGen II entrambe le sequenze. Quello che si nota è che la 60D da 800 iso a 1600 iso fa un vero e proprio salto di rumore, poterla usare a 800 iso raffreddata forse potrebbe essere la soluzione ottimale. In ogni caso mi sembra che il test sia positivo. |
user28347 | sent on April 23, 2017 (20:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
My mom spettacolone sharp and bright mamma mia che spettacolone nitido e luminoso |
| sent on April 23, 2017 (20:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella even this Marzio But for me the one with the 135 is much higher, around I think with that 135 you made a good buy for this type of photography Bella anche questa Marzio Per me però quella col 135 è nettamente superiore, in tutto Mi sa che con quel 135 hai fatto un ottimo acquisto per questo tipo di fotografia |
| sent on April 23, 2017 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Amazing! I can not say many more words! Hello !
Massimo :-) Stupefacente ! Non so dire tante altre parole ! Ciao ! Massimo |
| sent on April 23, 2017 (21:40) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
| sent on May 04, 2017 (22:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful field and rendered, so the 135/2 try me a lot of time, and with the 6D and the FF even more ... maybe for my birthday ... :-D
And yet a further confirmation that focusing on a single image per night, pay, good Marzio! ;-) Bellissimo campo e resa, eh si il 135/2 mi tenta da moooolto tempo, e con la 6D ae il FF ancor di piu...forse per il mio compleanno... e comunque una ulteriore conferma che concentrarsi su una singola immagine per notte, paga, bravo Marzio! |
| sent on May 05, 2017 (9:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I have reworked it but unfortunately on Juza there is no management version ... but we are intending
Here you find it reworked ... and I like a lot more :-D
www.astrobin.com/292955/B/?nc=user
l'ho rielaborata ma purtroppo su Juza non c'è lòa gestione delle versioni ...ma ci sta intendiamoci qui la trovi rielaborata ...e a me piace molto di più www.astrobin.com/292955/B/?nc=user |
| sent on May 05, 2017 (22:24) | This comment has been translated
|
| sent on May 05, 2017 (22:42) | This comment has been translated
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |