RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
The turret 3...

Il mare

View gallery (39 photos)

The turret 3 sent on March 23, 2017 (23:58) by Riccardo.asselta. 24 comments, 1199 views. [retina]

at 17mm, 1/640 f/8.0, ISO 100, hand held.




View High Resolution 16.2 MP  



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarjunior
sent on October 09, 2017 (9:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This bn exalts the shape of the stones, I like it very much! I like the sky less. I would have preferred a more rotated (or shifted) composition to the right with the tower approaching a wig to the left margin, always trying to give depth to the bigger branch but excluding the ones left to the left that disturb

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (9:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The inclusion of the foreground helps to give three-dimensionality to the photo, but I certainly would not include that pollen brought from the sea. I'm tired of commenting on the photo because it's well done, but I miss a subject or point of interest on which to focus. I would have dared a little more in the post, shading the blue and the aquamarine to have a nice dark sky that would have made it counterbalance the stones.

user72446
avatar
sent on October 09, 2017 (9:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very 'dynamic and three-dimensional' photos beautiful black and white, you've included several elements with the right proportions, a well-made picture !!!!

user90373
avatar
sent on October 09, 2017 (10:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Those of the F64 would certainly have focused on the foreground, and they were not mica-micio, bau-bau. ;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on October 09, 2017 (10:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

beautiful Riccardo, lots of compliments, exceptional pdr and sharpness, great b / n, so many compliments

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (10:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful in everything from the bianconero to the composition, the only defect for me is the first floor not in focus, wanting to include I would have closed the diaphragm or I would have just moved away ;-)

user81257
avatar
sent on October 09, 2017 (11:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You are trying to dial differently and okay, but try to be attentive to all the details.
In this photo a couple of things do not go: luminous stones that capture the scene (use a brightness mask) and extremely blurry.

avatarjunior
sent on October 09, 2017 (12:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It's a nice photo, but I would not have included it in the photo.

avatarjunior
sent on October 09, 2017 (14:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi, the picture is beautiful, but it is not clear if the subject is the branch or turret, I would use some other element in the foreground to give three dimensionality, this in my mind takes too much attention, very beautiful also the sky.

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (14:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I agree with Pippo, the photo itself is good at first sight, but having chosen a low pdr, the trunk makes you bother (usually we see it in such scenarios when placing the machine at half height-height 1.60). There is nothing to say about the development, maybe too much fired the stones, not bad but this time I would say it is redefined

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (15:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The branch in the foreground blurred me from a clutter of annoyance: P
and there is something in the frame that does not come back to me. Maybe the branch is too central, maybe moving it to dx?
The rest seems all right.

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (17:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I would have slightly moved the trunk so that I would look back at the house in the background ;-)
If possible I would cut out a part of the sky.
David

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (19:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Let's say the trunk in the direction of the turret would not have been bad, but also so I'm sorry, I also find here the gray bn

avatarsenior
sent on October 09, 2017 (20:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As PP exercise in bw you chose a great shot as a grayscale. maybe the clouds too flat but subjective. The good shot though the horizon penalizes for the non-physiological lineage ... In the comfy but not exhilarating. ;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on October 09, 2017 (23:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks to everyone for the suggestions.

avatarsenior
sent on October 10, 2017 (13:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I would have called it "the caiman". That's the effect that made me the piece of wood in the foreground. Which contributes a bit to vitalizing an image of its somewhat anonymous.

avatarjunior
sent on October 10, 2017 (14:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Aesthetically I like it, converting to B / N is great in my opinion, as does the rendering of heaven. It disturbs me a bit the very blurry outline. The rest I like!

avatarsenior
sent on October 10, 2017 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the low shooting point, but maybe it's a bit too low: a slightly higher pdr would better look at the tower, so the branch gets a little too much attention. I think the wood should be in focus, I would reduce the brightness of the stones to the left and add a bit of contrast to the clouds. Have you tried a vertical cut?

avatarjunior
sent on October 10, 2017 (18:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

good, but it can also be improved
the diagonal trunk would help
and even less light on the stones, light too hard

avatarsenior
sent on October 12, 2017 (10:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Impressions, beautiful photos




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me