What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 23, 2017 (2:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-or
what a beautiful picture, only compliments, Jupiter, you talented, but also a model!
Mario ciauuuzz 
ma che bella foto, solo complimenti, Giova, bravissimo tu, ma anche la modella!
ciauuuzz Mario |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (6:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful!
Greetings, Christiano. Bella!
Un saluto, Christiano. |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (7:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But graaazie super Mario :-) ciaooo y abrazo Ma graaazie super Mario  ciaooo y abrazo |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (7:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Christiano ;-) Thanks a lot greetings Grazie Christiano  un gran saluto |
user41490 | sent on March 23, 2017 (7:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Interestingly Taking the anxiety he is king!
Greetings Roby Scatto interessante l'inquietudine ne fa da padrone!
Un saluto Roby |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (9:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Venus shines ever so bright
Deep in the woods under the stars Venus shines so ever bright
Deep in the woods under the stars |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (12:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
:-) We are all restless souls overflowing life ;-) thanks Roby Siamo tutti anime inquiete debordanti vita grazie Roby |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (12:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Also, thanks to you, Anonima.genovese :-P Sempre grazie a Te, Anonima.genovese  |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (17:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, demand from the profane ... because f18? Bellissimo,domanda da profano...perchè f18? |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (17:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Snap stunning to say the least: on the whole the management of light and bw, but this model is also very good, very nice, however.
An image that has the magnetic, also for the excellent interpretation of it by the model with that wonderful insight. Scatto a dir poco splendido: su tutto la gestione della luce e del bw, ma bravissima anche la modella, molto bella, peraltro.
Un'immagine che ha del magnetico, anche per l'ottima interpretazione che ne da la modella con quello sguardo magnifico. |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (18:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very intriguing look, this model is beautiful gorgeous BN, compliments Molto intrigante lo sguardo, bellissima la modella e stupendo BN, complimenti |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (18:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mark :-) is indeed a pushed-haired, in the sense that it already enters the diaphragm closures counterproductive (although I always prefer closures thrusts openings to 1.2 or 1.4), but being contrary to pull the ISO to 50 (ISO nonnative, so let's put it) and having the flash sync at 180 (mysteriously, I have not yet figured out why, 6D, however, gives me the option between 1/160 and 1/200), the choice becomes mandatory of the diaphragm. Clear is that I could adjust the flash, probably towards the maximum power (I 2 500 W), but it is equally likely that during shooting I did not have time and desire to 'stop' the scene and adjust everything. From these things the combination of shooting data.
Hello Marco ;-) Grazie Marco in effetti è un pelo spinto, nel senso che si entra già nelle chiusure di diaframma controproducenti (anche se preferisco sempre chiusure spinte che aperture a 1.2 o 1.4), ma essendo contrario a tirare gli ISO a 50 (ISO non nativi, mettiamola così) e avendo il sincro-flash a 180 (misteriosamente -non l'ho ancora capito perché- la 6D però mi dà l'opzione tra 1/160 e 1/200), diventa obbligatoria la scelta del diaframma. Chiaro è che avrei potuto regolare la potenza o la distanza dei flash, probabilmente -in questo caso- verso la massima potenza (ne ho 2 da 500 W, anche se qui, a veder la luce e il riflesso negli occhi, è solo uno a funzionare), ma è altrettanto probabile che in fase di scatto non avessi avuto tempo e voglia di 'fermare' la scena e regolare tutto quanto. Da queste cose la combinazione dei dati di scatto.
Ciao Marco |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks :-) Seriola beautiful words. Hello Grazie Seriola splendide parole. Ciao |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (19:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mauri ;-) salutissimi Grazie Mauri salutissimi |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (20:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks all clear, with a power flash and iso already fixed the minimum you could not do more ... with f18 have everything in focus that perhaps with a portrait is not the best but much behind c was a beautiful black background so the model was well isolated ... congratulations ... I layman are intimidated by ... naked models deserve a professional. regards Mark Grazie tutto chiaro,con flash a potenza fissa e iso già al minimo non potevi fare altro...con f18 hai tutto a fuoco che magari con un ritratto non é il massimo ma tanto dietro c era un bello sfondo nero quindi la modella era ben isolata...complimenti...io da profano sono intimorito dal nudo...le modelle meritano un professionista. Saluti Marco |
| sent on March 23, 2017 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The flashes are not at fixed power, but stop to adjust, and then re-measure the light, etc. etc., it makes me spend the desire and, above all, pass the time. Then it is clear that between a 'time' and the other, some variation one face, although they are more variations of the position and distance of the flash, the more that of the powers.
I, as I said, I prefer the contrary, I like to have everything in focus, while I abhor almost diaphragms that leave you wide open one eye out of focus, or eyes in focus and the tip of the nose no, or anything like that ... matter of taste.
The isolation of the subject I like, in the absence of backgrounds that anyway disappear, to the limit by using a 200 mm. to 5.6 or similar. Neither are prof (and you can tell !!), but it is one year, so, it took me a female portrait and, whatthat time, a naked there may be.
Thanks again Marco y hasta la próxima I flash non sono a potenza fissa, ma fermarsi per regolare, per poi rimisurare la luce, ecc. ecc., a me fa passare la voglia e, soprattutto, passa il momento. Poi è chiaro che tra un 'momento' e l'altro, qualche variazione uno la faccia, anche se sono più variazioni di posizione e di distanza dei flash, più che delle loro potenze.
Io, come detto, preferisco, anzi, mi piace avere tutto a fuoco, mentre aborro quasi i diaframmi apertissimi che ti lasciano un occhio fuori fuoco o gli occhi a fuoco e la punta del naso no, o cose simili… questione di gusti.
L'isolamento del soggetto mi piace, in mancanza di sfondi che comunque spariscono, al limite usando un 200 mm. a 5.6 o similari. Neanch'io sono prof (e lo si vede!!), ma è un anno, poco più, che mi ha preso il ritratto femminile e, qualche volta, un nudo ci può stare.
Grazie ancora Marco y hasta la próxima |
user63535 | sent on April 07, 2017 (11:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Gio, look on 1D4 I do not go well (studio) 1 / 160s, the FP mode to find yourself with traditional flash mounted on the camera body, ex-550EX (I have two), but use them only in the studio as light hair lightened former
Use normally two studio flash softbox 500w + 130x180 ..
As for the photos, the usual great job.
Bravo Gio Ciao Giò, guarda che su 1D4 anch'io non vado oltre (in studio) 1/160s, la modalità FP la ritrovi con i flash tradizionali montati sul corpo macchina, ex 550EX ( io ne ho 2), ma in studio li utilizzo solo come luce di schiarita ex capelli
Utilizzo normalmente due flash da studio da 500w+softbox 130x180..
Per quanto riguarda la foto, il solito ottimo lavoro.
Bravo Giò |
| sent on April 07, 2017 (14:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Don of clarification, I will sleep soundly at last !! I thought of lacking some operation on the machine, on the other hand is ok. Thank you and kisses ;-) hello Don Grazie Don della precisazione, dormirò sonni tranquilli finalmente!! Credevo di mancare di qualche operazione sulla macchina, invece è ok. Grazie e baci ciao Don |
| sent on July 04, 2017 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oh, you can not say there is no depth of field: -D
Congratulations Giovanni, great shot.
I like how you ran lightning on your face.
Hello
Max Oh, non si può dire che non ci sia profondità di campo 
Complimenti Giovanni, scatto strepitoso.
Mi piace come hai gestito i lampi sul viso.
Ciao
Max |
| sent on July 06, 2017 (22:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Max :-D ;-) ciaooo Grazie Max ciaooo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
