RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Portrait and Fashion
  4. » Love at sunset

 
Love at sunset...

People 2

View gallery (6 photos)

Love at sunset sent on March 18, 2017 (21:25) by Alf22. 28 comments, 943 views. [retina]

, 1/320 f/6.3, ISO 200, hand held.




View High Resolution 12.5 MP  



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (11:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nice shot.

With the sun in your face is never easy taking (flare). I would have made it so underexposed, so as to have only the silhouette, but it's a personal taste.

I also hit the shot, in this case a bit 'of geometry would not hurt. If I place the two subjects in the center, in the same pose, with the sun in the middle it would be interesting.

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (11:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I have to contradict Elraw (and with his avatar makes me a little bad :-D), if I underexposed the silhouettes would be confused with the general blackness. I tried a pdr raised so that the figures could be stagliare the sunset.
Even so it remains an interesting shot. Quoto instead compositional suggestions (centering).

avatarsupporter
sent on March 20, 2017 (12:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful shot I just framed the second full-length.

user81257
avatar
sent on March 20, 2017 (12:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Essentially, the two most incisive mistakes in this picture are:
1) the recovery of the high lights of the sun, you've made a gray sun. The sun is burning, there is little to be done, let it burn.
2) the shapes, but slightly visible, are located in an area with the same tone background, so off to the sun or to the background but are confused. Would you have solved by putting the camera down.

user117231
avatar
sent on March 20, 2017 (12:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It is good.
For an advertisement for sunscreen? 8-)

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (13:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nice shot.

With the sun in your face is never easy taking (flare). I would have made it so underexposed, so as to have only the silhouette, but it's a personal taste.

I also hit the shot, in this case a bit 'of geometry would not hurt. If I place the two subjects in the center, in the same pose, with the sun in the middle it would be interesting.


Elraw, Thanks for the comment.

I've done it before shots of the genre with "templates" black, I wanted to change this time ... as you say personal taste.

For geometries, is I agree with you, however, is un'autoscatto on tripods, so I made the possibile, the sun is gone in 2 minutes. :-D

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (13:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I have to contradict Elraw (and with his avatar makes me a little bad MrGreen), if I underexposed the silhouettes would be confused with the general blackness. I tried a pdr raised so that the figures could be stagliare the sunset.
Even so it remains an interesting shot. Quoto instead compositional suggestions (centering).


Riccaldomelzi thanks for the comment.

As already said before, a wanted minimum open the shadows of the two individuals, but are personal tastes ..., share in fact the fact that the two figures, with a different pdr would better countered the sky. Thus only the heads in part.

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (13:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful shot I just framed the second full-length.


Riccardoasselta, thanks.

Yes, in hindsight, I would have turned away, (I would have put the most distant machine, being :-) timer, took the full figures, and made sure that they were at odds with heaven

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (13:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Essentially, the two most incisive mistakes in this picture are:
1) the recovery of the high lights of the sun, you've made a gray sun. The sun is burning, there is little to be done, let it burn.
2) the shapes, but slightly visible, are located in an area with the same tone background, so off to the sun or to the background but are confused. Would you have solved by putting the camera down.


Marco Thanks for the comment.

It is a "mistake" that I've noticed, I exaggerated in trying to under-expose the sun, and the gray halo effect, you notice.
On the second point, in hindsight, I agree.

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (13:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It is good.
For an advertisement for sunscreen? Cool

I ro, thanks for the comment no "technical or other", but comedian ... 8-)

Actually I was commissioned a spot, similar to that of a famous advertisement of glasses of a few decades ago. 8-) 8-) 8-), vampires, and the power of his glasses ...

avatarjunior
sent on March 20, 2017 (14:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Alf22
I believe the flare there may be, give a nostalgic feeling at the click as the sun goes perfectly
Also I like the composition
There is something wrong in post-production, however, that creates a sense of fake, I do not know how to explain.

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (19:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Alf, the idea is certainly good but not easy to take a picture in such a situation
From the compositional point of view I would have put the sun in one side of the picture (right or left) thus trying to move around the frame
In post I fully agree with Marco who preceded me
Hello Massimiliano

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (19:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Wow ... QST photo has a lot of trouble to solve x me.in first of the composition. Central Sun and symmetrical figures nos. A risky choice. Or the centers as others have said, or better shots with the sun in one of the third, which moves the photo that is already x self static.
The figures, dark, too dark to be recognizable x, and x be a little dark silhouette. I would have opted x silhouettes. Indeed, it would be even more stood out the heat contour of the sunlight on the templates.
The sky has a strange color. The recovery of the sun's light t has combined a mess. Even playing with masks of light, a bit of burn is inevitable.
Click to retry with qlc trick in more

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (21:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Alf22
I believe the flare there may be, give a nostalgic feeling at the click as the sun goes perfectly
Also I like the composition
There is something wrong in post-production, however, that creates a sense of fake, I do not know how to explain.


Raffsky with the comment.

If I could explain it better so I improve ... :-D

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (21:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Alf, the idea is certainly good but not easy to take a picture in such a situation
From the compositional point of view I would have put the sun in one side of the picture (right or left) thus trying to move around the frame
In post I fully agree with Marco who preceded me
Hello Massimiliano


Is the idea was good, but I understand that it is the pdr that the post has shortcomings.

avatarsenior
sent on March 20, 2017 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


avatarsenior
sent on March 21, 2017 (7:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello alf22 the romantic photo effect at sunset I find it perfectly successful ;-)
Unfortunately in these backlight conditions is not easy to manage everything, close the iris determines you a better tuning of the fire scene, but generates antiflatulent star on the sun and under exposure leads to a poor recovery of the shadows. All in all I think you've handled everything at best even if in these cases I prefer the silhouette. The only thing I do not like is the composition too much space on the right and the sun is not centered in the mid of the figures.

avatarsenior
sent on March 21, 2017 (8:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The shot seems succeeded although I cared a bit 'more laying, perhaps resting on the ground and pack bag would make it all a bit' more intimate: it seems a bit 'in a hurry, he (you) with your hand in your pocket does not seem very involved ... They are personal impressions, shooting in general it seems to me technically successful and also the composition seems apt.

avatarsenior
sent on March 21, 2017 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the last two comments .... I will learn slowly .... thank you in general all these comments, much more useful to a very beautiful, maybe I said to have the same comment or like 8-)

avatarjunior
sent on March 23, 2017 (14:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

as it regards the pdr I tried to put the sun in one of the third. Even a pdr "bottom-up" could be curious. I tried some shots in these conditions and are not easy for me, perhaps in this case, however, I would have closed more shadows opting for a silhouette that enhances the contours as you have suggested ... Hello!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me