RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Astrophotography
  4. » An old lunar eclipse

 
An old lunar eclipse...

Astrofotografia

View gallery (20 photos)

An old lunar eclipse sent on September 01, 2012 (22:07) by Stefano Palmieri. 4 comments, 2098 views.

Eclissi di Luna dell'8-9 Novembre 2003. C9,25 e Nikon coolpix 5700 in proiezione di un oculare william optics 40mm




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on September 01, 2012 (22:32)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Cosa vuol dire C9,25? Ci racconti come si fa una foto così? Non che ci voglia provare, solo per cultura.

What does it mean C9, 25? Tell us how to make a picture like that? Not that we want to try, just for culture.

avatarsenior
sent on September 02, 2012 (10:27)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


E' una bella sequenza, però non è una sequenza reale, cioè non è allineata sull'ombra della Terra (o sulle stelle). Altrimenti dovresti avere le varie esposizioni della Luna parzialmente sovrapposte e anche capovolte, cioè con le parti illuminate della Luna sempre verso l'esterno rispetto al momento della totalità. Dovresti cercare di individuare una stellina nei tuoi scatti e allineare su quella, ti verrebbe fuori una bellissima sequenza come quelle che si ottenenvano una volta su pellicola, esponendo sullo stesso fotogramma e inseguendo su una stella. Ci provai per l'eclisse di marzo 2007 chiarariedo.it/Servizio/eclisse03-03-07.jpg , in quell'occasione c'è stata la fortuna di avere una stella brillante vicina alla Luna, utilissima per allinerare le pose.

I singoli scatti comunque mi sembrano ottimi, nella versione ad alta risoluzione si vedono molto nitidi, cosa difficile da avere in proiezione da oculare.

ciao!

Chiara

It 'a beautiful sequence, but it is a real sequence, that is not aligned on the shadow of the Earth (or the stars). Otherwise you should have the various exposures of the Moon partially overlapping and even upside down, that is with the parts of the illuminated Moon always towards the outside than at the time of the totality. You should try to find a star in the frame and align on that, you would be out of a beautiful sequence such as those ottenenvano once on film, exposing the same frame and chasing a star. I tried the eclipse of March 2007 [URL =] chiarariedo.it/Servizio/eclisse03-03-07.jpg , at that time there has been fortunate to have a bright star close to Luna, useful for allinerare poses.

The individual shots still seem good, itlla high-resolution version can be seen very sharp, hard thing to have in projection eyepiece.

hello!

Clear

avatarjunior
sent on September 02, 2012 (14:03)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Diego scusa, il c9,25 è un telescopio in configurazione Schmidt-Cassegrain prodotto dalla Celestron.

Ciao Chiara,

come dice tu non è una sequenza reale ma montanta in un secondo momento in Ps. Nel 2003 mi avvicinavo all'astrofotografia e non avevo le conoscenze di oggi. Grazie per il suggerimento e complimenti per la tua eclisse ;-)

Diego excuses, c9, 25 is a Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope configuration produced by Celestron.

Hello Clare,

as you say it is not a real sequence but Montanta at a later time in Ps. In 2003 I approached all'astrofotografia and I had no knowledge of today. Thanks for the suggestion and congratulations on your eclipse ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 06, 2012 (23:33)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Scatto interessante!!

Taking interesting!


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me