What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 31, 2017 (11:37) | This comment has been translated
Very good! |
| sent on January 31, 2017 (13:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Remarkable, only compliments Notevole, solo complimenti |
| sent on January 31, 2017 (14:42) | This comment has been translated
Thanks cari |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (12:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but how much was originally apology?
What you scanned with ( scanner and dia ).
ma quanto era sottoesposta in origine scusa ?
Con cosa hai scansionato ( scanner e dia ).
|
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It wasn't at all. Non lo era affatto.... |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Agfascan 4000 Agfascan 4000 |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'd like to see the original DIA because it looks really post-produced very heavily Mi piacerebbe vedere la DIA originale perché sembra veramente postprodotte molto pesantemente |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Get to the point.... Arriva al punto.... |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As an excuse? Calm is ;-) Come scusa? Calmo è  |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice to tell me what you don't like... Calmissimo dimmi cosa non ti piace... |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
That looks postproduced very heavily.
What the dia is that? Che sembra postprodotta molto pesantemente.
Che dia è? |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but the problem is. do you like it or don't like it? it's not a topic about... Do you like this post? it was kodak sure, maybe even pulled at 800 ma il problema è.. ti piace o non ti piace? mica è un topic su... vi piace questa post? era kodak sicuro, forse anche tirata a 800 |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No, I don't like it, but if you posted it, it's to discuss it, isn't it? :-)
I had to because it gave me the idea that I had been sifting around the children, but I'm definitely wrong :-D No non mi piace, ma se l'hai postata è per discuterne no? 
Cheidevo perché mi dava l'idea di essere stata schairita in prossimità dei bimbi, ma sicuramente mi sbaglio  |
| sent on February 02, 2020 (21:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No comment... My answer is this... I don't understand why you think it's been cleared... Boh! No comment... la mia risposta è questa... non capisco perché pensi sia stata schiarita... boh! |
| sent on February 03, 2020 (8:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No comment I should say. Every time you say something, you're :-D
You understand that the dia underexposed because it is the classic digital file that comes from an underexposed dia.
You don't have to take it No comment lo dovrei dire io. Ogni volta che ti si dice qualcosa ti offendi
Si capisce che la dia sottoesposta perché è il classico file digitale che viene da una dia sottoesposta.
Non te la devi prendere |
| sent on February 03, 2020 (9:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but can I take it for something like that? it's just that you haven't explained yet why you think it's all here ma me la posso prendere per una cosa del genere? è solo che non hai ancora spiegato il perchè lo pensi è tutto qua |
| sent on February 03, 2020 (9:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I wrote to you. That's the yield of an underexposed dia scanned with a scanner without the power to illuminate a dia. It also happens with velvia 50, for that I asked you what dia was and what scanner you used. Tel ho scritto. Quella è la resa di una dia sottoesposta scansionata con uno scanner senza la potenza adeguata ad illuminare una dia. Capita anche con le velvia 50,per quello ti ho chiesto che dia era e che scanner hai usato. |
| sent on February 03, 2020 (9:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
agfascan 4000 is not adequate? ahahahahah agfascan 4000 non è adeguato? ahahahahah |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
