Argiope bruennichi

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

16.1 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Macro View gallery (4 photos)

Argiope bruennichi sent on August 27, 2012 (8:41) by Giulia Tom. 2 comments, 634 views.

, 1/20 f/14.0, ISO 200, tripod.

View High Resolution 16.1 MP

1 person like it: Stefano Coghene

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on August 29, 2012 (12:38)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Buoni la composizione e le cromie. La maf è però anticipata sulle zampe non includendo la testa del ragno e parte del corpicione, questo può succedere per un tuo errore di maf, per un alito di vento che ha spostato la ragnatela o per il soggetto che ha mosso qualche zampetta e di conseguenza la ragnatela ... in condizioni di ripresa non sicure meglio avere un tempo di scatto più ragionevole : alza se serve gli iso anche a 400 (non di più) ;-)

ciao e buona luce con poco vento, lauro

Good composition and colors. The maf is anticipated on the legs but not including the spider's head and part of the corpicione, this can happen to your own error maf for a breath of wind that moved the web or for the person who has moved some leg and consequently The web ... shooting conditions unsafe better to have a faster shutter reasonable: if you need to raise the ISO up to 400 (not more) ;-)
hello and good light with little wind, laurel

Giulia Tom

sent on August 29, 2012 (13:24)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Di sicuro non è stata l'aria perchè è stata scattata una mattina molto tranquilla ed in un posto riparato..probabilmente è stato un mio errore!
Grazie per i passaggi!

Certainly was not because the air was taken one morning in a very quiet and sheltered spot .. it was probably my fault!
Thanks for the steps!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.