What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 06, 2012 (12:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You do not seem to have focused so too selective on that piece of wall? wanted to blur the architecture behind? Non ti sembra di aver messo a fuoco in modo troppo selettivo su quel pezzo di muro? volevi sfocare l'architettura dietro? |
| sent on September 06, 2012 (13:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, the fire "excessively" selective was wanted to try to defocus as much as possible the turret in the background. you say too much? Si, il fuoco "eccessivamente" selettivo era voluto per cercare di sfocare il più possibile la torretta sullo sfondo. dici che ho esagerato? |
| sent on September 06, 2012 (16:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow! perhaps lacks a particular area within the focus so narrow ..
is quite invasive, out of focus ..  manca forse un particolare all'interno della zona a fuoco così ristretta..
è piuttosto invasivo il fuori-fuoco.. |
| sent on September 07, 2012 (8:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok, something tells me that the picture is not convinced you very much:-D
In fact, the subject is precisely the focus, the focus area is so small and so "empty" to not focus at that point.
At least this was my idea, then the experiment has not succeeded very well is quite possible:-D
anyway thanks to all
Ok, qualcosa mi dice che la foto non vi ha convinto molto 
In realtà il soggetto della foto è proprio lo sfuocato, l'area a fuoco è così ristretta e così "vuota" per non concentrare l'attenzione in quel punto.
Almeno questa era la mia idea, che poi l'esperimento non sia riuscito molto bene è possibilissimo
comunque grazie a tutti
|
| sent on September 07, 2012 (10:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
maybe you should use a blur less marked, so rendee sharper the background, because in this way the eye's attention is focused on that one strip in focus and the brain says: mmm missing something here .. ;-) forse avresti dovuto usare una sfocatura meno marcata, in modo da rendee più nitido lo sfondo, perchè in questo modo l'attenzione dell'occhio si focalizza su quell'unica striscia a fuoco e il cervello dice: mmm qui manca qualcosa.. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
IMHO