What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 17, 2017 (23:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Riccardo beautiful ... very interesting, intense and technically excellent Bella Riccardo... molto interessante, intensa e tecnicamente ottima |
| sent on January 18, 2017 (9:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Surgeon, I wanted to try my hand in the portrait with 17-40 and I must say that the results are more than decent. These gentlemen then had interesting faces, as I believe it is, in its uniqueness, the year in which they participate: a large store in the center of Cienfuegos, where they just, regular salaried by the government, which shoes shined to the few customers who occasionally peep. Grazie Surgeon, volevo cimentarmi nel ritratto con il 17-40 e devo dire che i risultati sono più che decorosi. Questi signori poi avevano dei volti interessanti, come credo lo sia, nella sua unicità, l'esercizio nel quale prestano la loro opera: un grande negozio nel centro cittadino di Cienfuegos, dove non fanno altro, regolarmente stipendiati dal governo, che lustrare le scarpe ai pochi clienti che di tanto in tanto fanno capolino. Con buona pace della nostra ossessione per la produttività |
| sent on January 23, 2017 (19:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great beautiful portrait. Gianni :-) Gran bel ritratto. Gianni |
| sent on January 23, 2017 (21:47) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Gianni! |
| sent on January 23, 2017 (22:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful portrait with a story to read in the background. Bel ritratto con una storia da leggere sullo sfondo. |
| sent on January 23, 2017 (23:02) | This comment has been translated
Very cool! |
| sent on January 23, 2017 (23:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Claudio, thanks Louis! Grazie Claudio, grazie Luigi! |
| sent on February 07, 2017 (0:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great portrait. Curious expression of the subject is lA three-dimensionality of the shot .. I like the light on his face! Ottimo ritratto. Curiosa l'espressione del soggetto è lA tridimensionalità dello scatto.. mi piace la luce sul suo volto ! |
| sent on February 07, 2017 (8:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Peppecris, I took the opportunity to test 17-40 in an atypical situation and did not disappoint. Excellent lens, lacks only one stop of light to be perfect. Grazie Peppecris, ho colto l'occasione per testare il 17-40 in una situazione atipica e non mi ha deluso. Ottima lente, le manca solo uno stop di luce per essere perfetta. |
| sent on February 07, 2017 (8:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
There is the 16-35 2.8! However for your genre of photography (portrait set) TI straconsiglio Sigma 24-35 f2. I think your perfect lens C'è il 16-35 2.8! Comunque per il tuo genere di fotografia ( ritratto ambientato ) TI straconsiglio il sigma 24-35 f2. Secondo me è la tua lente perfetta |
| sent on February 07, 2017 (9:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I was thinking about these days. I have to try it ... I already have two 24-70 f / 2.8, Canon and Tamron's first series, and I would say that is too much. I thought I would sell one and buy the Sigma. But I do not know what to give away. Ci stavo pensando in questi giorni. Devo provarlo... ho già due 24-70 f/2,8, Canon prima serie e Tamron, e direi che sono troppi. Pensavo di venderne uno e comprare il Sigma. Ma non so quale dare via. |
| sent on February 07, 2017 (9:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A 24-70 2.8 STABILIZZATOè life saving in some cases .. I would give away the Canon that is devaluing lot Un 24-70 2.8 STABILIZZATOè salva vita in alcuni casi.. io darei via il Canon che si sta svalutando parecchio |
| sent on February 07, 2017 (10:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So keep it all haha! Allora tieni tutto ahah! |
| sent on February 08, 2017 (11:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great sharpness! gran nitidezza! |
| sent on February 08, 2017 (20:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Do not get smart you have it you too 17-40 ... :-D Non fare il furbo che ce l'hai anche te il 17-40... |
| sent on February 08, 2017 (21:21) | This comment has been translated
|
| sent on February 12, 2017 (21:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The elbow cut in half of the subject in the foreground is the only negative of an otherwise perfect picture ;-) Congratulations Riccardo !!! Il gomito tagliato a metà del soggetto in primo piano è l'unica nota negativa di una foto altrimenti perfetta Complimenti Riccardo!!! |
| sent on February 13, 2017 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Baribal, shooting stems upright, more finished version, and that naturally includes the bust and the subject's arm. Then I posted the horizontal focusing my attention on the depth, but honestly I did not care what this actually is a serious mistake. Grazie Baribal, lo scatto nasce in verticale, versione più curata e che comprende naturalmente il busto e il braccio del soggetto. Poi ho postato l'orizzontale focalizzando la mia attenzione sulla profondità, ma onestamente non mi sono curato di questo che effettivamente è un errore grave. |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |